جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « government intervention » در نشریات گروه « اقتصاد »

The issue of government intervention in the economy is one of the issues that, despite its high importance for the Iranian economy, little research has been done on it. Among the reasons that justify government intervention in the economy are the production of public goods and services, redistribution of income, stabilization of the economy, natural monopoly and external positive and negative factors. On the other hand, today, capital markets as financial and economic exchanges of companies play an important role in the financial sector and the prosperity of economic activities. An efficient capital market can improve economic growth and attract domestic and foreign capital and play an important role in the process of economic development by stabilizing the financial sector and providing a suitable environment. Some experts believe that the continuous intervention of the government in the process of valuing stock exchange symbols in the capital market has prevented the economic growth and development of the country and is to the detriment of GDP. One of the threats that currently threatens the stock market as a financial market is the involvement of the Ministry of Economy and other government departments in determining the value of stock exchange symbols, and if government officials are not prevented from interfering in the daily stock valuation process, liquidity from the stock market It will move to other parallel markets. On the other hand, we know that stock prices in the capital market are determined entirely on the basis of supply and demand and such things as (environmental or macro factors, industry-related factors and internal factors or within the company. According to the explanations provided, the issue that the present study seeks is what are the effects of government interventions on the capital market during the years 1992-2021?

Investment of the main sources of growth and economic development. Therefore, the investment determinants is one of the most important fields of economists staduies. The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of economic freedom to attract foreign direct investment. For this purpose, we used a sample of selected countries in the period 1985-2014 with dynamic panel data approach and generalized method of moments (GMM). For the accurate measurement of both the Heritage Foundation Index of Economic Freedom (Index combines 10 indicators of economic freedom) and Fraser Foundation (index composed of 5 groups of indicators of economic freedom) is used. The results of desired models, show a significant and positive impact of economic freedom (with both define) In contrast, less government presence in the economy on attracting FDI. In this study also examines the effects of other variables effect on by FDI. The results show that globalization human capital have a significant and positive impact on foreign direct investment in the sample and ultimately inflation have a changing negative effect and significant on FDI.

Government has complicated multi-dimensional role in Economics. The effect of its policies would not be restricted inside the targeted market but changes the equilibrium and resource allocation on all other markets and, hence, the consistency of government policies is extremely important. In the literature although the role of government has been discussed hugely, however, the interrelation and dependency between government policies has not been considered as it weights. This article using structural equations modeling tries to analyze various dimensions of government interventions and determine the interrelation between its policies on different markets. Focusing on monetary, credit and foreign exchange markets, the results indicate a substitutive relation between interventions on credit and foreign exchange markets and complement relations between these two with money market. The substitutive relation between credit and foreign exchange market means that government has intervened in both to control external shocks and protect domestic production. But the effect of interventions is not restricted inside these two markets. The results show that monetary policies of government have been passive. In the last three decades government interventions in exchange and credit market have determined and leaded government policies in monetary market.