جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "welfare state" در نشریات گروه "اقتصاد"

The Nordic model has become a brand at the international political economy; the adoption of the social-democratic model has had more effects than a pure economic consequences. However, although the application of the principles of free market, innovation and free trade has brought welfare states into the industrialized world with high levels of GDP and high quality of living standards, it is this special social construction and political stability that has enabled them to experience this level of economic and social capital. This social construction and political stability is the result of the intellectual-social context of the Nordic field. Nordic universal welfare states have a system of social welfare, the provision of social and public services. Each tradition has formed a hybrid system of both the social democratic model and capitalist model in the Nordic region. The current studyaims to find how socio-cultural traditions have formulated both the formation and the solution of the difficulties and dilemmas of the Nordic model of universal welfare state. Consequently, based on a descriptive-explanatory method, this article examines the socio-cultural traditions of the Nordic society, including the free peasant tradition, the socialist utopia tradition, the capitalist and the governing tradition, and explains how to configure these traditions in principles foundations of "human development", "hybrid economy", "social capital" and "public trust", "equality", "solidarity and property" and "Nordic development model".

Liberalism encompasses a diverse range of political, economic, social, and cultural values that have been interpreted over time in various ways and have created various branches. This article deals with the main faces of economic liberalism. There have been three main branches of economic liberalism: Classical liberalism, egalitarian liberalism, and neo-liberalism. Classical liberalism has been developed in 19th century emphasizing the negative nature of freedom in the market. During the 20th century, two other faces of economic liberalism have been emerged. Egalitarian liberalism which likes a more equal distribution of benefits, and neo-liberalism which prioritizes economic liberalization policies such as privatization, deregulation, and free trade. Neo-liberalism supports the idea that free market needs a strong state in order to protect it.

This paper seeks to compare the model of publicsector in the economic model of I.R.I. Constitution and economies of WelfareStates. Thecomparison isbased on ideological principles and economic rules governing the public sector. We find that state role in both models properlyfollows the conventional economic literature on public sector, which focuses on naturalrole of state in the economy. Considering ideological literature and institutionalcapacity of state in both models, however, we find that I.R.I. constitution has moreinstitutional preferences compared with welfare state model. Primary source of this difference is inefficiencyof welfare state model, especially its inefficient system of economic norms (ideology) in practice which is extends far away from justice goals and wideninggaps in the economy. Normativeframework of public sector in economic model ofI.R.I. constitutionhas the capacity of securing economy from these inefficiencies. Regarding this, wepropose the state using the current fundamental capacity in the economic model of I.R.I. constitution, seeks grounding public participation towards constituted goals of the economy. As a practical approach, the state focusing on improvement and development ofeconomic culture, may achieve an efficient economic system through implementing economicjustice and revising the property movement pattern.