جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « production Sharing contracts » در نشریات گروه « اقتصاد »

Developments in the oil contracts of countries indicate that most countries have abandoned the use of service contracts only and resorted to the contract model of production sharing contracts and new concessions, or by modifying, have driven their contract models to a variety of partnership contracts. However, this study shows that although many legal efforts have been made in Iran and Iraq to use this contract model, but the lack of clear law in this regard has led to the reform process of oil contracts leading to the implementation of models of long-term service contracts. The results of comparing the economic evaluation of Iranian petroleum contracts with service contracts and production sharing contract in Iraq show that the production sharing contract has higher economic efficiency, while creating the necessary incentives for the contractor to implement risky projects, in various economic conditions creates greater alignment between the interests of the parties to the contract, establishes a more efficient and equitable distribution of technical and economic risks between them, which is an important factor for the commitment of the parties to the implementation and termination of the contract. Therefore, it seems that due to the prevailing conditions in the oil market, including competition and declining trends in oil prices the use of the contract model of production sharing contract, at least for fields with difficult conditions and common fields, is a solution, but to use it like other countries, more effective legal measures such as the enactment of a law is essential.

The process of development and thus national security and protection of the national sovereignty of the oil exporting countries at the global level depends on the conclusion of oil contracts and how they apply their sovereignty to such contracts. National security in the field of oil,gas and energy,which constitutes the most important economic sector of the country is affected by the extent of national sovereignty in oil contracts and the extent to which national sovereignty is observed in these contracts will also provide national security. According to the analysis of the scientific researches investigated by qualitative research method and by the use of meta analysis and directional content analysis by open coding method as well as implementation of Holesty test for coding validation high oil and gas handheld contracts in two main categories of assessing national sovereignty and security with the components (government ownership,host government management,sovereignty) and the evaluation of law with its component (intrest laws and regulations,jurisprudential rules,international law and regulation,international financial standards and accounting) and a variety of up stream oil and gas contracts including production Sharing contracts, concession and services contracts based on the level of compliance with the above factors,appropriate approaches have been developed and appropriate legal solutions have been Presented.

Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), this research compares Buy-back and Production Sharing Contracts (PSC) together to find the optimum contractual method in finance and project implementation in oil-upstream section for both independent and Iranian joint fields. The most important decision-making criteria for making contracts in upstream section of oil and gas industry are classified to "Before" and "After" contract approval. The criteria were selected by Delphi method. To do this research, two questioners were filled out by professionals in oil industry in two stages and the data was analyzed by EC software. The analysis of data indicates that the PSCs are preferable than Buy-back contracts in both independent fields (76.56) and joint fields (73.46).