جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « تکنیک تحلیل سلسله مراتبی » در نشریات گروه « مدیریت »

This study aims to identify the conditions and factors affecting smart money and prioritize the variables obtained based on these conditions in the Iranian stock market. This research method is applied in terms of purpose and based on data; it is a mixed type that was done to identify qualitative factors through interviews with experts and prioritize the identified quantitative factors using a questionnaire. The statistical population was selected using a sampling method with maximum diversity. The research model prioritized three levels with all specified conditions and factors and tested with software (Expert choice) and hierarchical analysis techniques. The incompatibility rate in all pairwise comparisons is less than 0.1, so the research model is approved. The criterion of causal conditions has gained the first rank in the first level. In the second level, among the categories (causal conditions, macroeconomic factors), (context conditions, laws and regulations imposed by the government) and (intervening conditions, Parallel Markets Behavior) rank first. At the third level, exchange rate fluctuations rank first.

The purpose of this research is to identify and rank the appropriate features of Iran Insurance Company's portal content management system using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique in 2019.

This research was applied in terms of its purpose and descriptive in terms of its implementation method, survey type and exploratory nature. The statistical population of this research includes two categories of all employees and experts of Iran Insurance Company in Khuzestan province. Overll 95 employees and 15 managers, heads of departments and users of the informatics department as experts in Khuzestan province were recuited in this study. Delphi and AHP techniques and SPSS and Expert Choice softwares were used in this research. A questionnaire was developed and distributed among employees to identify the appropriate features of Iran Insurance Company's portal content management system. Cronbach's alpha method was used to test the reliability of the questionnaire. It was greater than 0.7 Thus, the reliability of the questionnaire was good. In the third stage questionnaire, reliability was evaluated by examining the incompatibility rate of comparisons in Expert Choice software. Since the incompatibility rate for all comparisons was less than 0.1, the accuracy of the comparisons was confirmed.

Based on the results of Delphi technique, 42 questions (8 main factors and 34 sub-factors) were identified as important. Hierarchical analysis method was used to rank the factors. Based on the results of information factors with a weight of 0.202, history and objectives with a weight of 0.177, simplification of complex components with a weight of 0.150, fit of portal and portal extension with the organization with a weight of 0.127, words with a weight of 106 0.0, portal information accumulation with a weight of 0.092, portal links with a weight of 0.087 and publications with a weight of 0.067 were ranked first to eighth, respectively.

According to the results of this study, the hierarchical analysis technique can be used to identify and rank the appropriate features of the content management system of the portal of Iran Insurance Company. Information agents have the highest rank in the content management system of the portal of Iran Insurance Company and publications have the lowest rank in the content management system of the portal of Iran Insurance Company.

The goal of the administrative reform roadmap that has been conducted in 8 plans is steering administrative system to productive system based on Islamic values. In this research, by considering the strategy map, that is the foundation for Balanced Score Card (BSC), the strategic objectives are arrenged. These strategic objectives are in turn based on 8 plans of administrative reform roadmap. Then for identifying the cause and effect relations of each objective, the Fuzzy DEMATEL technique is used. So the most effective and the most impressible objectives are identified and weighted. In second step, the general performance evaluation criteria of government agencies that are defined in following of each objective are scored on basis of Fuzzy Analytical hierarchy process technique (FAHP) by implementation of Super Decisions software. Based on these results, system is created for performance evaluation of government agencies that their measures will be valued based on the strategic objectives of the administrative reform roadmap.

Technology Assessment is a critical issue that underlies many other concepts of technology management and its key role could not be ignored, especially in the Technology Strategy. In this paper, in order to assessment of the transportation technologies, it is attempted to study existing models in the area of technology assessment and then a suitable model for assessment of transportation technologies has been presented. The designed model includes three categories of indicators and each category is made up of 9 sub-criteria. These three categories are strategic importance indicators, the applications and needs coverage indicators, and the level of development and innovativeness of the technology. Sub-criteria of each category after the surveying of 44 experts of the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development and affiliated organizations determined and the opinions of these experts have been formed the basis of prioritization and determining of the indicators coefficients using the technique of AHP. Finally, based on the designed model, three technologies include Value Engineering, Pavement Management System, Awning Metal ware Cables have been assessed and respectively the scores 331.9, 338.3 and 25.7 were obtained for these three technologies. Based on the scores and designed model have been shown that all of mentioned technologies are the key technologies of the transportation area. In the end, according to research findings, practical suggestions are offered in every field.

If organizations are to survive in the area of customers, variable demands and diverse expectations, as well as, in the changing environment, they should create “value” for the customers and their communities. Value engineering (VE) is one of the methods of value-creation and value-improvement for products and services that not only is used in many fields such as industry, services, agriculture, education, transportation, road and construction and development projects, but it is also very effective for decisions in government and nongovernment arenas. In this research using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in value engineering process, by considering limitations, a product (automobile) will be introduced to the market that will provide the best value for customers and community.Today, the necessity of introducing a new product to the market is felt in this company, but it is not possible to put it to practice because of the time required for this project as well as lack of needed financial resources. Facelift is a suitable alternative for the defined problems. Hence, the aim of this research is to determine the best parts for facelift with regard to the investment limitations. Therefore, with the usage of an integrated model of VE and AHP the best decision is selecting the most effective exterior parts for auto-design.