جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "رتبه بندی وبومتریکس" در نشریات گروه "مدیریت"

In recent years, university ranking is one issue that is increasingly being discussed in higher education and scientometrics literature. The main purpose of this paper is to introduce, compare and analyze the nine indicators of university ranking systems and higher education institutions (SHANGHI, QS, THES, HEEACT, Webometrics, Leiden,Newsweek and Regional Ranking of the Islamic world(ISC). To compare these ranking systems, their results in various years as well as the existing literature have been studied. that the result is that the criteria used in ranking systems of QS, THES, Webometrics are student-centered while the rankings of Shanghai, Leiden and HEEACT are more based on research. There is much similarity between the rankings Compared with the limited scope of the global surface area is greater similarity between the data.

More than forty years global studies on foresight and Futures Studies, including agricultural context, reveal the special benefits on S&T policy making proces : (1) informing policy making procces (2) facilitating policy implementation (3) preaparing policy acceptance bacground(4) facilitating public cooperation in policy making (5) supporting policy denfinition (6) modifing policy making structure. “Iranian Agriculture Science and Technology Roadmap” project has proposed in 2010. Analyzing the performance of agriculture research organizations and introducing technological and research priorities to achieve national agriculture vision 2025, was the main aproach of IRASTR. This project followed by foresight survey, included Delphi and scenario study on four fields : Fishery, Foresty and Pasture, Herbaceou production, Water and Land. A review on this project is revealed, results of foresight have been used as feeding information to science and technology periorities, and agriculture research system policy making.