جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « نسخ یک جا » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

In recent years, the Iranian Parliament has explicitly annulled numerous titles or provisions of laws through resolutions. In some cases, these annulments have led to doubts or ambiguities in the legal community. This article provides an independent examination of two such resolutions concerning the annulment of laws in the fields of environmental protection and public health. While it became apparent that legislators and approvers have sincerely addressed the reform of the country's legal system, certain technical flaws were evident. The author believes that ambiguity in the amendment rules, which should inherently be the subject of independent legislative scrutiny, has contributed to these flaws. This research, which falls within the realm of legal doctrine, first constructs a framework for legal amendment based on authors' opinions and existing procedural laws. It then identifies some minor shortcomings in the amendment of these laws within this theoretical framework. The article provides political recommendations aimed at determining the finalization rules and amending laws in the internal regulations of the Iranian Parliament, avoiding as much as possible partial amendments and excessive specialization in list formation, refraining from including expired or invalidated laws in amendment lists, and avoiding the annulment of laws influenced by secondary legislation regarding the form of amendment rules. In areas where legal loopholes have arisen due to the approval of these lists, it is recommended that rules be established for the management of shared water resources and for determining the responsibilities of government employees in dealing with malfunctions.