جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « verses of challenge » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The Holy Qur'an is the miracle of the Prophet of Islam (PBUH), in which challenges (tahaddῑ) to it are mentioned in several verses; however, thinkers have had differences in the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this challenge. Using the descriptive-analytical method, this research, which was written in response to the question of wisdom in the difference in the content of Tahaddῑ verses, after quoting and analyzing the existing concepts, by re-reading the verses of the challenge and emphasizing the context, which is one of the most well-known means of understanding the meanings of the Qur'an, proves that challenges are as follows: in Surah Al-'Isrᾱ' the challenge has not been done while a challenge in Surah Yunus with one Surah in terms of explaining the summaries of other holy books, a challenge in Surah Hud repeating the news of the past in different styles and chapters without differences, a challenge in Surah Toor in the way of repeating the contents which not only does not cause boredom but also cause simultaneous in the hearts to tremble and the hearts of the believers to calm down, and a challenge in Surah Al-Baqarah with a surah whose contents are mutually supportive and without any contradictions, even though it was revealed gradually, also from an 'Ummῑ person (as a person who did not go to school), and finally, the challenge in Surah Al-Qasas with a book containing beliefs, rules and morals that guides people in this world and the hereafter.

Challenging the Holy Qur'an to the fact that it is beyond human comprehension to write a book like it has always been the clearest proof of its divinity. The enemies of Islam have tried for a long time to respond to this advance challenge of the Holy Quran, but they have always failed. In recent years, the most important book have written in opposition to the Holy Qur'an is HOSN AL-EIJAAZ that its publication among the Arab and Islamic communities has provoked various reactions from scholars and Muslim nations. This article, which is the most recent research on this subject, has used the analytical-critical method to review and critique this book in three axes: format, content and proofs. According to the findings of this study, due attention to the verses of the Holy Qur'an that are presented as an advance challenge, it is clear that this book is not even worthy of opposition to the Holy Qur'an let alone to similarity with the Qur'an. Therefore, ZAFER, like other claimants of rivalry, has failed in this field.