جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "seismic pounding" در نشریات گروه "عمران"
تکرار جستجوی کلیدواژه «seismic pounding» در نشریات گروه «فنی و مهندسی»-
هدف این مقاله، بررسی اثر ضربه ساختمان مجاور بر پاسخ های ساختمان جداسازی شده لرزه ای با جداسازهای آونگی اصطکاکی دو و سه قوسی با در نظر گرفتن فواصل لرزه ای دستورالعمل بهسازی لرزه ای ساختمان های موجود (نشریه شماره 360) است. بررسی کفایت فواصل لرزه ای محاسبه شده طبق نشریه 360 برای ساختمان های جداسازی شده با جداسازهای اصطکاکی قوسی در پژوهش های پیشین انجام نشده است. برای رسیدن به این هدف، ابتدا مدل سه بعدی ساختمان های جداسازی شده در دو حالت با برخورد به سازه مجاور و بدون برخورد ایجاد شد. برای هریک از مدل های ذکر شده، 6 جداساز آونگی اصطکاکی دوقوسی و 15 جداساز آونگی اصطکاکی سه قوسی با ابعاد و ضرایب اصطکاک متفاوت، جهت در نظر گرفتن گستره ای مناسب از دوره تناوب ها به کار برده شد. سپس از روش تحلیل تاریخچه زمانی غیرخطی برای محاسبه پاسخ های لرزه ای مدل ها استفاده گردید. بدین منظور، هفت شتابنگاشت از پایگاه داده معتبر انتخاب و به ساختمان ها اعمال شد. پاسخ های لرزه ای هریک از مدل ها شامل شتاب طبقات، جابه جایی بیشینه سیستم جداسازی، جابه جایی نسبی بین طبقات و برش پایه سازه محاسبه و تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان می دهد ضربه لرزه ای، برخی پاسخ ها را به میزان قابل توجهی افزایش داده است. به عنوان مثال، شتاب طبقه و تغییرمکان نسبی بین طبقه ای برای ساختمان با جداساز سه قوسی بر اثر ضربه به ترتیب 2 و 6 برابر شده است. در نتیجه، ممکن است مقدار فواصل لرزه ای محاسبه شده براساس نشریه 360 کافی نباشد و باعث ایجاد ضربه و افزایش پاسخ های ساختمان به میزان قابل توجهی گردد.
کلید واژگان: جداسازی لرزه ای, ضربه ساختمان مجاور, جداساز آونگی اصطکاکی دوقوسی و سه قوسی, نشریه 360, تحلیل تاریخچه زمانی غیرخطیIn this paper, the effect of seismic pounding of adjacent structures on buildings isolated by double (DFPB) and triple friction pendulum bearings (TFPB) is investigated. The seismic gaps between buildings are calculated based on the Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, standard No. 360 of Iran, which is not considered for friction pendulum bearings in the previous studies. To this end, a three-dimensional single-story building model is created in the MATHLAB program considering two scenarios including the case without pounding and the case with it. In addition, fifteen different TFPBs and six DFPBs are utilized as seismic isolators to cover a wide range of fundamental periods of the isolation system. Finally, nonlinear time history analyses with seven pairs of ground motion records are conducted to obtain some of the seismic responses of buildings including base shear, drift, story acceleration and maximum displacement of the isolation system. The results show that the seismic pounding considerably increases responses of base-isolated buildings. For example, the floor acceleration and the drift ratio of isolated building with TFPB increased 2 and 6 fold because of seismic pounding. It shows that the seismic gaps calculated by the formula of standard No. 360 may not be sufficient to prevent severe seismic poundings and increase of seismic responses.
Keywords: Base Isolation, Seismic pounding, Double, Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing, The 360 Standard, Nonlinear time history analysis -
The topic of pounding of adjacent structures has greatly attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. Among the observed damages due to the earthquake, one could refer to those damages induced by pounding of the adjacent structures which is a prevalent phenomenon. The reason for this issue is the lack of separation joint or its inadequacy between two adjacent buildings. When an earthquake occurs, difference in the structures' frequencies would result in difference in their reaction relative to the ground acceleration and pounding would take place. In this article the effects of site soil type, structure type, its height and distance from the fault on the separation joint for the steel and reinforced concrete moment resisting buildings with 3, 5, 8 and 12 stories are investigated. The structural models are first designed by structural design software and then are analyzed under various time histories using Seismostruct software. The obtained results show that the highest hazard risks corresponding to collision between the adjacent buildings belong to areas near the faults located on soft soil types and collision of two buildings with different types is the most severe collision. Different conditions have been discussed in this paper and based on the results, some editions to criteria of seismic design code of Iran has been proposed considering to distance to active faults, soil conditions and type of structure.
Keywords: Seismic pounding, Adjacent Buildings, Seismic Joint, Seismic microzonation, Dynamic nonlinear analysis, Deterministic seismic hazard analysis, Site amplifications -
Seismic pounding occurs as a result of lateral vibration and insufficient separation distance between two adjacent structures during earthquake excitation. This research aims to evaluate the stochastic behavior of adjacent structures with equal heights under earthquake-induced pounding. For this purpose, many stochastic analyses through comprehensive numerical simulations are carried out. About 4.65 million time-history analyses were carried out over the considered models within OpenSees software framework. Various separation distances effects are also studied. The response of considered structures is obtained by means of Hertzdamp contact element. The models have been excited using 25 earthquake records with different peak ground accelerations. The probability of collision between neighboring structures has been evaluated. An efficient combination of analytical and simulation techniques is used for the calculation of the separation distance under the assumptions of non-linear elasto-plastic behavior for the structures. The results obtained through Monte Carlo simulations show that use of the current provision’s rule may significantly overestimate or underestimate the required separation distance, depending on the natural vibration periods of adjacent buildings. Moreover, based on the results, a formula is developed for stochastic assessment of required separation distance.Keywords: Seismic pounding, Hertzdamp element, Separation distance, Time history analysis, Stochastic analysis
-
Seismic Pounding Response of Singled-Degree-of-Freedom Elastic and Inelastic Structures Using Passive Tuned Mass DamperThe present paper addresses the comparative study of two adjacent single-degree-of-freedom structures for elastic and inelastic systems with and without pounding. The study is also carried out in the presence and absence of tuned mass damper under (TMD) seismic excitations. The tuned mass damper considered for the present study is a passive device attached to single main structural unit in the simplest form as soft storey at the top of main system. Total eight models have been considered depending upon the presence and absence of pounding as well as TMD in the analysis. The entire numerical simulation is carried out in time domain form by considering the inputs of four real earthquake ground motions. Outcome of the present study indicates that elastic adjacent structural system always overrates the pounding forces than the inelastic adjacent structural units. The use of TMD reduces the pounding forces in the adjacent structures. During pounding, the results show that the structural displacement response is much more sensitive for inelastic systems mostly under consideration or ignorance of TMD. One of the observations is that there is large amount of variation in the structural energy formation of adjacent structures while considering or ignoring the pounding as well as TMD.Keywords: Seismic pounding, SDOF elastic, inelastic stick system, Time, history analysis, Passive tuned mass damper, Gap element Push, over analysis
- نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شدهاند.
- کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شدهاست. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.