به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "ایمنی" در نشریات گروه "مهندسی زلزله"

تکرار جستجوی کلیدواژه «ایمنی» در نشریات گروه «فنی و مهندسی»
جستجوی ایمنی در مقالات مجلات علمی
  • پویا امیرچوپانی*، احمد نیکنام، افشین حسینی
    یکی از مواردی که ایمنی سازه قاب خمشی بتنی را مخدوش می نماید، رخداد لرزه ای نادر در طبیعت است. زلزله بم در سال 2003 میلادی نمونه ای از این گونه رخدادها بوده که منجر به وارد شدن خسارات زیاد به سازه های نوساز گردید. در این مقاله ظرفیت فروریزی سازه ها، با استناد به مجموعه شتاب نگاشت های استاندارد آیین نامه FEMA P695 و وابستگی سازه به بزرگ ترین زلزله منطقه ای(MCE)، مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است. برای تعیین ظرفیت فروریزی سازه، لزوم وجود یک روش جامع و کامل که توانایی بیان رفتار لرزه ای سازه ها را داشته باشد به چشم می خورد. در این مقاله از تحلیل بار افزاینده دینامیکی غیرخطی (IDA) به منظور بیان رفتار لرزه ای سازه ها استفاده شده است. هدف از این مقاله، بررسی ایمنی سازه ها، تحت اثر رخدادهای نادر طبیعت با استفاده از روش بار افزاینده دینامیکی غیرخطی می باشد.
    کلید واژگان: بار افزاینده دینامیکی, ظرفیت فروریزی, بزرگ ترین زلزله منطقه, ایمنی, سازه بتنی
    Pouya Amirchoupani *, Ahmad Niknam, Afshin Hosseini
    One of the situations that distorts the safety of concrete moment frame structures is the rare seismic events. Bam earthquake in 2003 was one of the rare seismic events that caused damages to many newly built structures. In this paper, the capacity of structures was evaluated according to the standard record sets of FEMA P695 and maximum considered earthquake (MCE). A comprehensive method should be used to express the seismic behavior of structures for assessing the collapse capacity. Incremental dynamic analyses proposed by Vamvatsikos and Cornell in 2002. This method is used for assessing the collapse capacity of structures in this study. The proposed methodology is used for collapse assessing of an individual as well as a group of buildings with due attention to rare seismic events and incremental dynamic analyses method. Illustrative results show that, if structures provide minimum acceptable requirements of FEMA P695, they would have been secured against rare seismic events.
    Development of nonlinear models for collapse stimulation is the first step of collapse assessing methodology. All of the structures have been designed according to ASCE 7-05 code, and for expressing of nonlinear behavior of materials, Mander and Menegotto-Pinto model has been considered. Selection of ground motion record sets for collapse assessment of building structures is very important. Both far-field and near-field records have been considered in FEMA P695, but in this paper, the far-field records were used. Three analyses have been considered in assessing the collapse capacity. Eigenvalue analyses, incremental dynamic analyses and static pushover analyses are required for assessing the collapse capacity. Incremental dynamic analyses is one the suitable methods for expressing of seismic behavior of structures. The basic idea of this analysis was described by Bertero in 1997. In 2002, this method was accompanied with big progress by Vamvatsikos and Cornell. Illustrative results show where the incremental dynamic analyses curve slope is equal to 20% of the elastic while the point also belongs to softening branch defined as collapse point. Additionally, another candidate point is displacement ratio of 10%. Illustrative results show that where the incremental dynamic analyses curve lining to infinity is being defined as collapse point. The incremental dynamic analyses curves show record to record variability, thus it is essential to summarize such data. The fragility fitting approach has been used widely for defining the median collapse acceleration. Adjusted collapse margin ratio is the most important parameter for assessing the collapse capacity of structures. According to FEMA P695, the acceptable value of the adjusted collapse margin ratio for each individual model within a performance group should exceed ACMR (20%). Additionally, the average value of adjusted collapse margin ratio for each performance group should exceed ACMR (10%).
    Finally, collapse capacity of 5 and 10 story concrete moment frame structures are defined. Both structures have acceptable adjusted collapse margin ratio and both of them have acceptable safety according to rare seismic events. Structures that could not satisfy the FEMA’s conditions must increase their lateral strength and re-evaluate.
    Keywords: Incremental Dynamic Analyses, Collapse Capacity, Maximum Considered Earthquake, Safety, Concrete Structure
  • محسن غفوری آشتیانی*
    برای کاهش خطرپذیری ناشی از سوانح طبیعی، نیاز به استفاده از دانش، علم و فناوری؛ همراه با مشارکت عمومی آمیخته با شناخت حقایق علمی و واقعیتهای طبیعی، فرهنگ و باورهای دینی داریم. لذا با توجه به تاثیر باورهای دینی در رفتار انسانها، سعی شده با بهره از آموزه های اسلامی با رویکرد فرهنگسازی مردم به ویژه جوامع مذهبی؛ بتوانیم مردم را خواهان ایمنی نموده تا در جهت کاهش خطرپذیری و نیل به پیشرفت قدم های موثری برداریم. در این مقاله تلاش شده با شفاف سازی و بیان نظرات دین اسلام درباره سوانح طبیعی تصورات و مفاهیم غلط شکل گرفته در جامعه اصلاح گردد. بدین منظور ابتدا اصول علمی و راهبردی کاهش خطرپذیری سوانح؛ نظر اسلام در مورد سوانح، نعمتهای خدا، زمین، کردار نیک، رفتار انسانی و ایمنی انسان با بهره مندی از قرآن و احادیث؛ و در نهایت ارتباط آنها ارائه شده؛ تا با انتشار این نوع نگاه دانشی- دینی- اسلامی شاهد پاکسازی تصورات غلط و افزایش قدرت درک صحیح مردم از سوانح باشیم. سوانح طبیعی باعث خرابی و کشتار انسانها نمی شوند؛ بلکه عدم شناخت صحیح، رفتارهای غیرعقلی، و استفاده های غلط و غیر منطقی انسانها از طبیعت است که ویرانی ها را موجب می شود. خداوند ما را از این نوع رفتارها منع کرده و از ما با هدایت عقلی خواسته با پیروی از هدایت اسلام، درک و استفاده صحیح از طبیعت به عنوان نعمت الهی، به کارگیری خرد و دانش، هدایت و رهبری دانایان در مسیر زندگی بهتر و امنتر، رفاه، حفظ جان و سرمایه انسانها، توسعه اجتماعی و حیات قرار گیریم.
    کلید واژگان: اسلام, قرآن, زلزله, سوانح طبیعی, ایمنی, مدیریت خطرپذیری, توسعه پایدار, پیشرفت
    Mohsen Ghafory, Ashtiany*
    This paper by presenting the guiding principle of disaster risk reduction, the key concepts of Islamic teaching, and the views of Islam on disaster and earthquake in particular; intends to correlate between them with the objective of developing an effective disaster risk awareness and preparedness, especially among a religious community, toward risk reduction and safety. The paper also tries to clear the existing misconception of assuming that disasters are due to God’s anger, etc. in order to increase people's understanding of and knowledge about disaster-related issues; as a necessary step in the process of disaster risk reduction and improving safety and development. In ancient times when science was in its infancy, people believed that disasters, especially earthquakes, represented the power of Mother Nature and humans’ vulnerability and were dominated by the need to survive amid the ferocity of nature. Today, a new approach is needed in order to change the mentality of traditional communities regarding the concepts that disasters are God’s will or expressions of His wrath. It is necessary to clarify misconceptions such as those relating to fatalism and God’s will about whether individuals will be saved or sacrificed to disaster, and that mosques and holy places are immune to damage, as was believed during the past earthquakes. Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is defined as a combination of hazard, vulnerability of the built environment, and human socio-economic and cultural impacts, as well as in terms of a country’s level of governance, capacity, preparedness and response to catastrophic events when they occur. The "guiding principles" of DRR can be outlined as: 1) Belief in the facts of nature and existence of natural hazard of the earth; Comprehensiveness; 2) Expert leadership and good governance is essential to the success of DRR programs; 3) Risk reduction should have the objective of sustainable development, but this can only be achieved effectively through collaborative efforts devoted to promoting good management; and 4) Risk reduction requires long-term actions based on consistent policies and backed by tolerance of the slow pace of the implementation. Key Concepts of Islam which relate to the principles of risk reduction can be outlined as: 1) Submission to the will and guidance of Allah (God) based on cognition, wisdom, belief, faith and revelation, resulting in “good deeds”, vitality and happiness; 2) Human deeds and behavior should be based on belief, and belief should be complemented with good deeds; 3) Leadership of wise, elite, and intellect; 4) High value is attributed to group work, social activities, social responsibilities, co-operation and consultation in various aspects of life; 5) God’s will (Taghdir and Sonnat Elahi) is based on human deeds and behavior; 6) Human beings do not have any right to harm themselves or others and highest importance is given to respecting and observing the “Human Rights”; 7) Public Supervision (Amr-bil-Maruf); and 8) Sin means violating God’s guidance by ignoring facts and knowledge, being negligent or failing to use knowledge; etc. It can easily be seen that many of the key concepts in Islam support the guiding principles of DRR. These concepts are among the best guidance for Muslims towards good quality and safe construction and developments and as a means of stopping negligence in order to avoid seismic losses and earthquake disasters. The Holy Quran as the principal source of religious thought in Islam with its multi dimensional meanings, is also the principal source of guidance on all aspects of life and can comprehensively be adapted to all times and matters. The term “Earthquake” is mentioned directly in Chapter 99 of the Quran; and indirectly in various verses such as: 7:78, 7:91, 7:155, 7:171, 16:26, 17:37, 17:68, 29:3, 34:9, 67:16, 69:5, etc. Chapter 101, “Asr” (The Time) has special address to Belief and Good Deeds, an action required if people desire to reach success and be rewarded by being safe during natural events. It should be noted that no statement by the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) ever mentioned that earthquakes or other disasters are expressions of the wrath of God or the result of disobedience or infidelity. Instead, there are many statements that show the need to prepare for disasters and prevent them from happening. Correlation between Islamic teaching and risk reduction principles: The Papers shows that people by following God’s guidance, can realize themselves and in religious terms, as an ultimate goal, reach heaven. In this world, 'heaven' can be interpreted a productive, safe, healthy, happy and peaceful life. According to this, “belief” and “doing good deeds” can be interpreted in most as follows: 1) Belief: believing that our Creator’s guidance is for the best of human performance and better living. People are encouraged by being given free will, awareness and knowledge to follow God’s guidance, which is comprehensive and covers all aspects of life. Believing in wisdom, facts and expertise; as well as accepting, respecting and following spiritual, individual, social and technical laws, rules and regulations. Thus, Islam and Abrahamic religion in general, encourages people to believe in earthquakes as natural phenomena and facts of the Earth and, based on this belief, encourages them to do good deeds; 2) Doing good deeds: doing the best acts possible, based on the most correct beliefs and best knowledge. In relation to earthquakes and safety, this means planning and development that are compatible with hazards; obedience to building codes and regulations; following the leadership of experts; using seismically safe construction; and, finally, using knowledge and wisdom to make the most correct use of God’s bounty and nature. In the case that people perform bad deeds and do not follow the path their punishment is destruction and loss of life, which will result in disaster. In other words, bad deeds that are carried out on the basis of ignorance or negligence and without using appropriate logic, in theological language are called 'Sin'. Thus, losses and disasters mainly result from people's bad, incorrect and inappropriate deeds. This is the simple explanation on the concepts and statements that disasters are resulted from sin. Hell, which is the result of sin, refers to a life with misery, destruction, lack of community development, and so on. Thus, disaster is not God’s wrath or his anger with regard to humanity; it is simply the result of people's bad deeds and failure to follow God’s guidance in all aspects of our lives. The discussion of the paper can be summarized as: 1) Risk communication and knowledge dissemination should be compatible with people's beliefs and cultures. I believe that the use of religious teaching and knowledge of disaster and development can be an effective way of promoting safety; and 2) Sustainable development and “Vitality” can be achieved through faith, knowledge and the conduct of good deeds. If we reject or ignore wisdom and refuse to use the know-how that God has given us as his bounty, we will do sin and face “disaster”.
    Keywords: Islam, Quran, Earthquake, Natural Disasters, Safety, Risk Management, Sustainable Development, Progress
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال