جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "water poverty index" در نشریات گروه "آب و خاک"

Water resources are the common aspect of the goals and challenges of sustainable development, the lack of which is one of the big multidimensional problems of the current century and is one of the main reasons for positive and negative developments in the world. Therefore, the water poverty index (WPI) is one of the indices defined for this purpose. This index shows the effect of the combination of effective factors on the scarcity and stress of water resources. It provides the conditions for prioritizing and developing management versions in different regions. To determine water scarcity and poverty in each region, attention should be paid to the conditions of water resources in the studied region, the ability to calculate the index and the existence of information and data in the studied region, as well as the selection of selected criteria and components in that region. In this study, the water poverty index is used to investigate the shortage and tension of water resources and for its influence on drought, its relationship with univariate drought indices based on precipitation including standardized precipitation index (SPI) and Z score index (ZSI), and variable indices based on precipitation and evapotranspiration including standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and reconnaissance drought index (RDI) were searched.

The study area in this research is the Hashem-Abad meteorological station in Gorgan Township, and the statistical period for calculating the water poverty index based on the data available in the study area was considered to be 13 years (2003-2015). The water poverty index in this research is calculated based on five main components, which include the resource (groundwater loss), meteorological (temperature and precipitation), consumption (water need), capacity (river discharge), and environmental (salinity). Each of the components must be weighed after calculating to calculate the water poverty index. For this purpose, the AHP hierarchical technique was used. First, a questionnaire was prepared and the components were scored based on the opinion of regional water experts and university professors, then, using Expert Choice software, the weight of the main components of the water poverty index was determined, and finally, the WPI for the study area in this research was also estimated. Then, in the next step, drought indices SPI, SPEI, RDI, and ZSI were calculated in 6-month and 12-month time windows. To calculate the drought indices, the precipitation and temperature data at the Hashem-Abad meteorological station for a period of 30 years (1990-2019) were considered, which were sorted monthly and the coding necessary to calculate the SPI and SPEI indices in time windows 6 and 12 months was done by R programming and statistical software. Also, two indicators, RDI and ZSI, were calculated in the Excel software. Finally, the relationship between drought indices and the water poverty index was searched based on simple one-to-multivariate correlations.

The results of the water poverty index’s components showed that the resources and environment component had the highest value in 2009 and 2010 and the lowest value in 2010 and 2016, respectively. About meteorological, capacity, and consumption components, the highest values were in the years 2010, 2004, and 2009, respectively, and the lowest values occurred in the years 2010, 2016, and 2016, respectively. Questionnaire analysis of WPI components with AHP showed that resources and environment components had the highest and lowest weights with values of 0.354 and 0.041, respectively. However, by multiplying these weights by their related components, it was found that the components of consumption, environment, resources, meteorology, and capacity had the greatest effect in calculating the water poverty index. The range of WPI changes during the years (2004-2016) varies from 26 to 82, so 2014, which is one of the driest years, the region was in the poorest state of water resources and the year 2008 had the best conditions. Considering the average WPI of about 55, out of the 13 years studied, the WPI was lower than the average in 8 years. In the next step, due to the lack of data, there was no possibility of non-linear modeling, therefore, simple one-to-multivariate correlations were used. The results of these correlations showed that the use of the multivariate linear regression method by considering the drought index in a 12-month time window along with two six-month time windows related to the first and second half of the year increases their correlation with the water poverty index. Examining the effect of the time window considered for the drought index on the water poverty index shows that the 12-month time window has a higher correlation than the six-month time window. Also, among the six-month time windows, in the SPEI index, the first six months of the year, which includes the spring and summer seasons, had a higher correlation with the water poverty index. Correlation results between drought indices and WPI showed that the annual time interval is more suitable than the 6-month time one. And among the 4 indices studied, the SPEI index with R2=0.90 had the highest correlation while the ZSI index with R2=0.81 had the lowest correlation with WPI.

Based on the results of the components of the water poverty index in this research, it was observed that the consumption component in the Gorgan region had the biggest role in the WPI estimation, so water conservation can have a great contribution to solving water poverty. Due to the high volume of water consumption in the agricultural sector, some measures should be taken to manage water consumption and choose the appropriate cultivation patterns. The high correlation of WPI with drought indices, especially the SPEI variable index, makes the importance of creating a drought monitoring and forecasting system more tangible, and due to global warming and climate change in the future, which this region is not exempt from, it can make the problems of water poverty and lack of water more severe in this region.

Considering the increasing dependence of humans on fresh water, especially groundwater, which is the most important source of water supply in arid and semi-arid regions, assessing the sustainability of aquifers is crucial. In this regard, assessment indicators are used, which usually do not have a clear boundary between the classification of indicators and they overlap with each other in different fields such as economy, society and environment. Also, researchers usually rely on a number of indicators that can be measured for their case study. Due to this lack of data, in this article, an attempt has been made to collect and categorize various indicators that have been used to assess groundwater in aquifers in arid and semi-arid regions of the world.

This research has been a literature review of previous articles and studies in the world in the field of assessing the sustainability of groundwater based on different indicators. The course of movement and progress of these indicators in articles and their classification in environmental, social, economic and institutional categories has been in the framework of this research. Also, the composite indicators that have been prepared for topics under the sustainability subcategory, such as the water poverty index, have been considered in this research. The water poverty indicator is a subset of the competition criterion and a social indicator. This indicator has been proposed as a subset of the water competition criterion, which is an important indicator for measuring the level of poverty caused by water scarcity, especially in arid and semi-arid lands such as significant parts of West Asian countries. In other words, this indicator connects water and poverty. 

The results indicate that the environmental indicators with a share of 63% have the highest number among the articles and physical indicators include more than half of the environmental indicators. After that, economic indicators with 18%, social indicators with 14% and institutional indicators with 7% are in the next ranks in terms of numbers, which shows the attention of experts to the importance of the environment and economy on the sustainability of aquifers.

Although social indicators comprise only 13% of all indicators, but due to their importance and weight, they need more studying. Also, these types of indicators are mainly dependent on the case study, so using the studies of sociologists is a great help for real investigation and it will aim at the sustainability of aquifers. Also, due to the fact that sustainability evaluation is an interdisciplinary field, the selection of its indicators needs strong theoretical foundations, therefore, team work with the presence of different experts will increase the quality of the study results. Considering that the institutional indicators mainly play the role of the answer in the issue of aquifer sustainability, therefore, compiling institutional indicators in the future and including a logical weight for these indicators during the assessment of sustainability is very important in raising the quality of the assessment. Institutional indicators are mainly related to governance, and considering that the development approach is to reduce the concentration of management from top to bottom, there are fewer institutional indicators and the focus is on other indicators.

Climate changes and the occurrence of droughts with different intensities, improper water resources management, overuse of water resources and not paying attention to the water balance of these sources, has caused a water crisis in recent decades. Accordingly, in this research, the status of surface and subsurface water resources in Fasa plain during 2008-2018 using Water Poverty Index (WPI) based on five weighted components include resources, availability, capacity, consumption and environment was assessed. Then, considering the importance of climate changes and droughts occurrence with different intensities on water resources, the correlation coefficient between the climate changes and the drought changes in annual time scale and WPI was used to assess the effects of climate changes and droughts occurrence on WPI in the study area. The results showed that water resource consumption and the water resource capacity indices had the highest and the least roles in WPI (respectively). According to the results, WPI vary from 0.297 to 0.678 in the study area and the worst situation of WPI has occurred in Fasa plain in 2013. Results indicated, the WPI in Fasa plain at the short term is more dependent on drought changes (Compared to climate changes (. Finally, it is suggested to tackling water poverty in the Fasa Plain, the management of water resources consumption of this plain, especially in drought conditions, it is very important.