جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « education » در نشریات گروه « مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی »

The overall goal of this research is to measure the impact of the articles of the Agricultural Research, Education, and Promotion Organization researchers using altmetrics indicators in the Scopus citation database from 2018 to 2020. 3748 scientific works of Iranian researchers have formed the statistical community of the research. To conduct the research, first, the information related to the organization's researchers' articles in the Scopus database was extracted from the organization's scient metric system, and the retrieved articles were entered into the Excel software based on the output report (title of the article, year of publication, name of the journal, and number of received citations). The results were presented using descriptive and analytical statistical methods, various metrics related to 5 altmetrics indicators were presented in tables, and the number of citations received in Scopus was analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation using SPSS software. The results were presented in the form of tables and analyzed using SPSS software using descriptive and analytical statistical methods. The results of the present study showed 3701 (99%) had at least one altmetrics index, and 3246 articles (87%) were cited. The process of receiving altmetrics indicators has relatively increased in this period of time.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the status of compliance with the "Methodology for Evaluation and Ranking of Scientific Publications" of the MSRT in the extensional journals of AREEO. The research community consists of 18 agricultural extensional journals that were being published until 3/27/2023 and were accessible from the Agriculture Virtual Library section on the website of the ACIST. The research method was a descriptive survey. To collect research data, a researcher-made checklist was used, which consisted of 49 indicators. A checklist was completed for each journal. The collected data were processed in Excel software. Descriptive statistics methods (frequency, average, tables) have been used to analyze the data. The findings of the research showed that the average compliance with the indicators of the publication guidelines in the extensional journals of AREEO was 49.10%. Among the six main indicators of publication, the index of "structure and quality of articles" (87.32 percent) has the highest score, and the general indicators of "observance of publication ethics" (20.66) and "publishing in indexes" (21.70) have the lowest rank. "Agricultural Information Science and Technology" with 94.5 out of 100 points, was the only extensional magazine of AREEO that has received "A" rating.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the H-index among researchers of the Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) and to investigate the relationship between their academic rank and bibliographic measures of research productivity.

This is a descriptive-applied research that has been carried out using a scientometrics approach. The study population consisted of 2125 faculty members in four categories: professors, associate professors, assistant professors, and instructors. The research organization's scientometrics system was used for data collection and Spearman correlation test was used to investigate the relationship between research variables.

The results showed that from 2125 faculty members 337 (15.86%) were female and 84.14% were male. The number of assistant professors was 1261 (59.34%) that is the highest frequency and only 2.4% of the population are the professors. The study population produced a total of 12734 articles that its 50.14% have been authored by professors and 73.51% by assistant professors. The average citations received were 626.82 for professors’ papers, 113.69 for associate professors’ papers, and 45.3 citations for assistant professors’ papers respectively. Also the mean H-index of the was 9.88 for professors, 4.39 for associate professors, 2.15 for assistant professors, and 0.72 for the instructors. According to the findings, there was a significant relationship between academic rank and three scientometrics indices. In addition, H-index of women was higher than men.

Investigation of the relationship between academic rank and H-index among faculty members of AREEO shows that there is a moderate correlation between them.