به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "sign system" در نشریات گروه "هنر و معماری"

جستجوی sign system در مقالات مجلات علمی
  • کامران پاک نژاد راسخی*، ایرج داداشی، مرتضی بابک معین، امیر مازیار

    تمام آثار هنری شامل عنصر مشترک فرم هستند، از سویی تمامی اشکال و فرم های هنری محتوای معنایی خود را از طریق رسانه ها و کانال های حسی، به شکلی تاویل پذیر به مخاطب منتقل می نمایند؛ از این نظر ساختار این عنصر قابل انطباق با ساختار سه گانه نشانه نزد پیرس یعنی بازنمون، تفسیر و موضوع بوده و همچنین فرآیند شکل گیری تجربه حسی فرم توام با انگاره های تفسیری در آثار هنری نیز مطابق با مفهوم ابداکسیون پیرس قابل صورت بندی است. در مقایسه فرم زیبایی شناختی با ساختارهای زبانی نیز ویژگی های مشترک بیانی، ویژگی مفصل بندی مضاعف و اطلاعات پایگی میان دو حوزه زبان و هنر قابل مشاهده است.فرم در آثار هنری از نوع رمزگان متنی و ادراکی بوده و نیز در چهارچوب طرح واره های تنشی فونتانی قابل تحلیل می باشد. به این ترتیب الگوهای چهارگانه فرآیند تنشی در فرآیند ادراک زیبایی شناختی نیز قابل مشاهده هستند که با تحلیل این الگوها در حوزه های معماری اماکن مقدس، هنر مینیمال، معماری گالری های هنری و کاربرد هنر موسیقی در سینما، انطباق این الگوها را بررسی نموده ایم. با تحلیل تمام ویژگی های اشاره شده می توان نتیجه گرفت که عنصر زیبایی شناختی فرم نیز نوعی سیستم نشانه ای بوده و به خوبی با روش های پژوهش نشانه شناختی کلاسیک و نوین، قابل تحلیل می باشد.

    کلید واژگان: فرم, سیستم نشانه ای, ابداکسیون, فرآیند نشانگی, فرآیند تنشی
    Kamran Paknejad *, Iraj Dadashi, Morteza Babakmoin, Amir Maziar

    All works of art include the common element of form as one of the most important aesthetic elements. At the same time, all forms and types of art have a variety of expressive forms that convey their semantic content through the media and sensory channels to the audience. In this sense, the aesthetic element of the form in works of art represents the most important features of sign systems. The structure of this element is compatible with Pierce's triple sign structure, namely representation, interpretation, and subject, and the process of forming the sensory experience of form, which is combined with interpretive notions in artwork, can also be formulated by Peirce's concept of abduction. Comparing aesthetic form with linguistic structures, the common expressive features as the double articulation and the information base can be seen as two sign systems shared by both language and art.Form in the artwork has textual and perceptual codes, and can also be analyzed within the framework of Jacques Fontaine's tensive process, an analytical model of the processes of the creation of meaning in the form of modern semiotics. Thus, the four patterns of the tensive process are also visible in the process of aesthetic perception. Analyzing these patterns in sacred architecture, minimal art, gallery art architecture, and the application of music in cinema, we examined the conformity of these patterns. By analyzing all the above-mentioned features presented in the text, it can be concluded that the aesthetic element of the form in works of art is also a type of sign system and can be well analyzed by classical and modern semiotic research methods. It should be pointed out that this research is an analytic-descriptive study.All works of art include the common element of form as one of the most important aesthetic elements. At the same time, all forms and types of art have a variety of expressive forms that convey their semantic content through the media and sensory channels to the audience. In this sense, the aesthetic element of the form in works of art represents the most important features of sign systems. The structure of this element is compatible with Pierce's triple sign structure, namely representation, interpretation, and subject, and the process of forming the sensory experience of form, which is combined with interpretive notions in artwork, can also be formulated by Peirce's concept of abduction. Comparing aesthetic form with linguistic structures, the common expressive features as the double articulation and the information base can be seen as two sign systems shared by both language and art. Form in the artwork has textual and perceptual codes, and can also be analyzed within the framework of Jacques Fontaine's tensive process, an analytical model of the processes of the creation of meaning in the form of modern semiotics.

    Keywords: Form, sign system, abduction, semiosis process, tensive process
  • امیررضا استخریان حقیقی، ستاره احسنت*

     نشانه ها تنها ابزار ارتباطی واجد معنا می باشند که ویژگی منحصر به فرد آن ها در وابستگی به بسترهای فرهنگی و تاریخی، نحوه رشد معرفت بشری را آشکار نموده و می توان این امر را با تاکید بر روابط میان نشانه ها و معنای آن ها با عالم خارج بررسی نمود. پژوهش حاضر در تلاش است، تا با تکیه بر دو ساحت نظام نشانه ای و فرآیند نشانگی، به تحلیل نشانه شناختی سیر تحول خط تا خوش نویسی فارسی بپردازد. پرسش این است که، چگونه می توان در رسالت رسانه ای خط و خوش نویسی، نسبتی با نظام نشانه ای و فرآیند نشانگی مبتنی بر نقاط اشتراک آن ها یافت؟ هدف پژوهش، بر تبیین زمینه های وابستگی ریشه های مشترک، میان خط و نوشتار با نظام نشانه شناختی استوار است که به شیوه تطبیقی- تحلیلی و در راستای مطالعه منابع معتبر مکتوب و اسناد تصویری به روش کیفی توصیف می گردد. بدین منظور با توجه به سیر تحول نشانه شناختی خط تا خوش نویسی، ابتدا، نقش نظام نشانه ای، در این میان احراز شده و سپس، لایه های اشتراک میان آن ها در برخورد با مولفه های فرآیند نشانگی تبیین می گردد. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که، خط و خوش نویسی در سیر تحولات خویش، همواره، زبان بصری بدیعی خلق نموده که می توان دگرگونی آن ها را در انواع نظام نشانه ای شمایلی، نمایه ای، نمادین و انتزاعی جستجو نمود. این در حالی است که، نسبت میان آن با فرآیند نشانگی و در قالب دریافت متعلق نشانه شناختی، نمود و تفسیر نیز آشکار می گردد.

    کلید واژگان: خط و خوش نویسی, رسالت رسانه ای, نظام نشانه ای, فرآیند نشانگی, پیرس
    A. R. Estakhrian Haghighi, S. Ahsant *

    Signs are the only meaningful tools of communication that their unique properties in affirmation of cultural and historical context reveals how human knowledge grows which can be investigated by emphasizing the relationships between the signs and their meanings with the outside world. Sign system and its relation to the signage process is a subject which discussing about it is possible based on dependency of sign investigation, the process of their emergence as well as the various implications of signs and their application.Charles Sanders Peirce is one of the thinkers who discovered these implications and access to the hidden meanings of signs, by classifying its features in figurative and symbolic forms, in a point of view as a sign system and has addressed the relationship between them in the ratio of the sign with the context of its occurrence and the interpreter as signage process.In this trend, the signs act in the form of visual media which the quality of their mission in transmitting the message depends on the recognition of the signs and their proper classification since each sign is, on the one hand, dependent on other signs and related components and on the other hand, is variable in terms of its application, which is presented in different communication textures corresponding to different cultures, civilizations. This leads to signs always being considered as a language. Also, different forms considered it to have a diverse linguistic structure with distinct functions. In this regard, the present study is trying to analyze the semiotics of the evolution of calligraphy to Persian calligraphy, relying on the two areas of the sign system and the process of signification. The main question is, how can one make the connection between the semiotic developments of calligraphy and calligraphy with the sign system and the process of notation based on their commonalities? Furthermore, what is the difference between the sign system and the evolution of Script into calligraphy? The main purpose of the research is to explain the fields of dependence of common roots between Script and writing with the semiotic system. Also, the sub-objectives of the research are that first, despite receiving structural differences, while there are fundamental components between the two, their unity in explaining a similar theme such as the sign is achieved. Then, in order to analyze the semiotics of the media course of script to calligraphy in relation to the sign system and the process of signification, to study and study the course of these developments. It also seeks to explain its effective capabilities as the inheritor of human deep thoughts and creativity from the earliest times of human culture and civilization to the present day, in explaining similar themes such as visual cues. With these interpretations, in spite of previous research, the necessity of such a study is based on the distinct analysis and reading of script to calligraphy developments, in a scientific framework and with a specific semiotic approach, which gives the opportunity to look at the history of Iranian art differently. Role is a sign that has remained intact, both in terms of theoretical foundations and in terms of aspects discussed. Therefore, the importance of studying and establishing the relationship between the two is an achievement that does not have a significant background. The methodology of this research is analytical and using the study of written library resources and visual documents and according to Peirce's views, it is among the developmental researches. It also qualitatively shows that the semiotic analysis obtained from the study of visual documents of script to calligraphy, makes it possible to understand its commonality with the sign system and the process of signification. To this end, due to the vastness of the historical scope of script and calligraphy developments, it has first tried to study and divide calligraphy developments in the stages of calligraphy, thought writing, transliteration and alphabet. Then the objective instance of the written visual cues and its implicit meanings in each period should be applied separately to the punctuation classification. For this purpose, the images have been selected from the statistical population of the visual documents of calligraphy transformation in such a way as to cover as much as possible the course of visual and symbolic developments of script to calligraphy from the beginning to the present. It also reveals more precise and tangible differences in sign differences and the goals of rising from their meanings. Because only with a proper understanding of the concept of sign and its effect during stylistic differences is the evolution of script to calligraphy, which can be examined to match the role of the sign with the desired practical and artistic process. The research findings show that script and calligraphy in the course of their developments have always created an innovative visual language that can be searched for in various symbolic, index, symbolic and abstract sign systems. However, the relationship between it and the process of signification and in the form of semantic belonging, manifestation and interpretation is also revealed.

    Keywords: Script, Calligraphy, Semiotic, Sign System, Media, Charles Sanders Peirce
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال