جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "سرقت ادبی" در نشریات گروه "پزشکی"

This study aimed to Survey role of librarians working in central libraries of medical universities type 1 in relation to plagiarism and deal with that was conducted.
This method is analytical survey study and this study is applied. The questionnaire was standardized America Library Association. The population consisted of employees of Medical Universities librarians type 1 are (110) people, sampling was census. The sampling method was census. Validity and content validity and reliability of the method using test-retest correlation coefficient of 78/0 was confirmed by the data collection practices and postal mail was sent. SPSS software to analyze the data descriptive statistics (mean,...) and inferential statistics (chi-square Chi-square) were performed.
91 percent of respondents reported more than 4/40 that of students and teachers in how to cite contributed. Chi-square test showed that librarians to students about the style of citation and how to refer to sources of advice and level of education of relationship there (p-value = 0/02 in 30% of librarians in preparing brochures and training assignments with teachers have been working.
In this study, given that librarians have little activity in most areas studied and of its role in this regard had very low awareness to the conclusion that our librarians are information literate, are alien to raise the level of education of librarians and workshops so they can be with introduced his new role.

Misconduct includes all serious deviations of ethic actions in research proposals and conducting and reporting research results. Scientific misconduct impairs the reputation of the author and ensuring the accuracy of his work. The purpose of this study was to review the types and causes of misconduct when conducting nursing research and how to deal with it. This study was conducted in 2013 with reviewing available literature and articles related to scientific misconduct in nursing research and searching in databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, Proquest, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Iranmedex and SID. English and Persian articles that published in 2000 to 2012 were selected. Various forms of misconduct are including nonconformity the principle of human samples protection, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Factors such as pressure on individual for academic promotion, competition between researchers and personal and professional interests can encourage nurses for misconduct. Some methods such as assessing researchers explain about the process of complete consent form, using anti plagiarism software, assessing standard deviation of data and correlation coefficient between variables use for misconduct identity. There are many types of scientific misconduct in nursing research that affects researcher, results and related organization. So it is needed to prevent it with existed methods and develop the same instructions to support and encourage researchers with appropriate performance.