به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "hospital stay" در نشریات گروه "پزشکی"

  • Mayuu Kobata, Kenta Takeda, Mana Taguchi, Hiroai Okutani, Takeshi Ide, Akane Kido
    Background

    Pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), a surgical procedure for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), is a highly invasive surgery requiring prolonged hospitalization. Previous studies have reported that postoperative analgesia using regional anesthesia contributes to shorter hospital stays after surgery under general anesthesia by reducing acute postoperative pain. However, the association between postoperative analgesia and the length of hospital stay (LOHS) following P/D has not been evaluated.

    Objectives

    To evaluate the association between postoperative analgesia and postoperative LOHS after P/D.

    Methods

    This single-institution observational study enrolled consecutive adult patients undergoing P/D under general anesthesia, who postoperatively received either intertransverse process block (ITPB) or continuous intravenous (IV) fentanyl infusion as postoperative analgesia between March 2022 and February 2023.

    Results

    Among all enrolled patients with ASA physical status II or III (n = 60), postoperative analgesia was administered using either continuous ITPB (n = 19) or continuous IV fentanyl infusion (n = 41). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative analgesia with continuous ITPB (P = 0.007), a lower incidence of major complications after surgery (P = 0.034), and female sex (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with a shorter postoperative LOHS. In subgroup analysis, patients who received continuous ITPB had significantly lower postoperative LOHS, lower postoperative serum C-reactive protein levels on postoperative day (POD) 3, and reduced acute postoperative pain on POD3 compared to those who received continuous IV fentanyl infusion.

    Conclusions

    Postoperative analgesia using continuous ITPB appears to be associated with a reduction in LOHS following P/D for MPM under general anesthesia.

    Keywords: Hospital Stay, Postoperative Pain, Regional Anesthesia, Surgical Complications
  • Majid Keivanfar, Mahnaz Kheiri, Sharareh Babaie, Mohsen Reisi *
    Background

    The rising prevalence of chronic respiratory failure in pediatric patients necessitates a detailed evaluation of home mechanical ventilation (HMV).

    Objectives

    This study assesses the advantages of HMV devices, focusing on cases from Imam Hussein Children's Hospital.

    Methods

    This research involved 20 children who required long-term ventilation and were admitted to both general and intensive care units at Imam Hussein Children's Hospital in Isfahan. Before discharge, a team of HMV experts trained the parents on the proper use of the ventilation devices. Post-discharge, the educational needs of the parents were assessed continuously, with regular home visits conducted by a nurse and a representative from the ventilator supplier.

    Results

    Approximately 73% of the children demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness following HMV implementation. About 35% of parents observed no adverse effects in their children. The average cost savings from reduced ICU rehospitalizations was significant at 347.59%, and there was a 65.09% reduction in the costs associated with general ward hospitalizations.

    Conclusions

    The adoption of HMV has led to improved health outcomes, substantial reductions in medical expenses, and shorter hospital stays. It is advisable to plan for broader implementation of HMV in children who require long-term ventilation.

    Keywords: Mechanical Ventilation, Children, Medical Costs, Hospital Stay
  • سینا بنی جمالی، آلدوز آلوش، واهان مرادیانس، طیب رمیم، هاله افشار*
    مقدمه

    بیماران مبتلا به COVID-19 می توانند اختلالات انغقادی مختلف و پیچیده ای داشته باشند که بررسی نقش آنتی کواگولان ها با دوز های مختلف در outcome بیماران مبتلا به کووید 19 ضروری به نظر می رسد. لذا مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین وضعیت فاکتورهای پیشگویی کننده شدت بیماری از جمله تعداد لنفوسیت ها،LDH و وضعیت بهبودی بیماران انجام شد.

    روش کار

    مطالعه در بیماران مبتلا به COVID-19 بستری دربخش مراقبت های ویژه بیمارستان حضرت رسول اکرم (ص) انجام شد. زمان شروع آنتی کواگولان، نوع و دوز آنتی کواگولان دریافتی و مدت زمان مصرف ثبت شد. بیماران بر اساس دوز آنتی کواگولان در یافتی به دو گروه دوز پروفیلاکسی، دوز بالاتر از پروفیلاکسی (دوز متوسط و دوز درمانی) تقسیم شدند.

    یافته ها

    از مجموع بیماران مراجعه کننده به بیمارستان رسول اکرم 90 نفر (شامل 43 نفر زن (47.8%) و 47 نفر مرد (52.22%) وارد مطالعه شدند. میانگین روزهای بستری در بخش ICU 12.39 ± 13.50 روز و در بیمارستان 13.36 ± 17.18 روز بود. همچنین مدت زمان استفاده از آنتی کوآگولان برای بیماران 13.38 ± 17.13 روز بود. 53 بیمار (58.9%) دوز پروفیلاکسی، 28 بیمار (31.1%) دوز درمانی و 9 بیمار (10%) دوز متوسط آنتی کوآگولان دریافت کردند. نوع آنتی کوآگولان دریافتی در 74 بیمار (82.2%) از نوع هپارین تجزیه نشده (unfractionated heparin) و در 16 مورد (17.8%) از نوع هپارین با وزن مولکولی پائین (low molecular weight) بود. تغییرات LDH، تعداد لنفوسیت، دی دایمر، فیبرینوژن، فریتین و FDP برحسب دوز آنتی کوآگولان دریافتی در سه گروه پروفیلاکسی، درمانی و متوسط اختلاف آماری معنی داری نداشت.

    نتیجه گیری

    در نهایت یافته های بدست آمده از مطالعه نشان داد که استفاده از دوزهای متفاوت آنتی کواگولان تفاوتی در سطح LDH، تعداد لنفوسیت، فریتین و FDP در زمان های مختلف و همچنین زمان اقامت در بیمارستان و زمان بستری در بخش مراقبت های ویژه اندازه گیری ایجاد نمی کند.

    کلید واژگان: کووید 19, آنتی کواگولان, واحد مراقبت های ویژه
    Sina Banijamali, Oldooz Aloosh, Vahan Moradians, Tayeb Ramim, Haleh Afshar*
    Introduction

    Patients with COVID-19 can have various and complex coagulation disorders that cause hypercoagulable conditions. Investigating the role of anticoagulants with different doses in the outcome of patients with COVID-19 seems to be needed. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of predicting factors of severe disease, including the number of lymphocytes, LDH, and the recovery status of patients. 

    Methods

    A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in Hazrat Rasool Akram (PBUH) Hospital. Study entry includes acute respiratory symptoms caused by COVID-19 disease (uncontrollable cough, dyspnea, prolonged medicine and blood saturation drop) along with lung involvement in chest spiral CT scan without injection, SARS RT-PCR–CO virus test was positive and transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) was indicated. Anticoagulant starting time, type and dose of anticoagulant received and duration of use were recorded. Two groups of prophylaxis dose, higher dose than prophylaxis (medium dose and therapeutic dose) were divided.

    Results

    Out of the total number of patients referred to Rasul Akram Hospital, 90 people (43 women (47.8%) and 47 men (52.22%)) participated in this study. The average hospitalization in the ICU was 13.50 ± 12.39 days and 17.18 ± 13.36 days in the hospital. Also, the duration of coagulant therapy was 17.13 ± 13.38 days. 53 patients (58.9%) received a prophylactic dose, 28 patients (31.1%) received a therapeutic dose, and 9 patients (10%) received a moderate dose of anticoagulant. Anticoagulant in 74 patients (82.2%) was unfractionated heparin (UFH) and in 16 cases (17.8%) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The changes of LDH, number of lymphocytes, dimer, fibrinogen, ferritin and FDP according to the dose of anticoagulant assessed in the three groups of prophylaxis, treatment and no statistically significant difference. The mean of ICU admission days according to different doses of anticoagulant did not show a statistically significant difference.

    Conclusions

    Finally, the findings obtained from the study showed that the use of different doses of anticoagulant does not cause a difference in the level of LDH, number of lymphocytes, ferritin and FDP at different measurement times. Also, the length of stay in the hospital and the time of hospitalization in the intensive care unit did not differ between the groups receiving prophylactic anticoagulant, medium dose and therapeutic dose.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Anticoagulants, Prophylaxis, Hospital stay, ICU Admission
  • Leila Barati, Seyed Ali Mousavi Khosravi, Safa Ariannejad, Ali Ahani Azari, Lobat Shahkar *
    Background

    Bronchiolitis is a lower respiratory tract infection and one of the major health concerns and hospitalization factors in infants.

    Objectives

    This study aimed to address inconsistencies in treating this disease.

    Methods

    This study is a double-blind clinical trial investigating the effect of salbutamol, epinephrine, and 5% inhaled hypertonic saline on treating infants with bronchiolitis referred to the Taleghani Pediatrics Hospital in Gorgan, Iran, during 2019 - 2020. The clinical results of the treatments and hospitalization stay were also evaluated.

    Results

    In this study, the study sample encompassed 18 girls and 39 boys. There was no significant difference between the three groups regarding age, gender, parental literacy level, and history of allergies. Salbutamol and epinephrine, in comparison to hypertonic saline, were effective in shortening patients' hospital stay (P = 0.004). Moreover, there was a significant difference between the oxygen saturation of in the patients 48 h after treatment in the salbutamol and epinephrine groups compared to the saline group (P = 0.001).

    Conclusions

    In comparison to hypertonic saline, salbutamol and epinephrine can be selected to treat children with acute bronchiolitis since they can shorten hospital stay improve O2 saturation, and decrease treatment costs imposed on the health care system and families.

    Keywords: Hospital Stay, Children, Salbutamol, Epinephrine, Hypertonic Saline, Bronchiolitis
  • Zahra Nekoukar, Shahram Ala, Siavash Moradi, Andrew Hill, Ali Reza Davoudi Badabi, Ahmad Alikhani, Shahriar Alian, Minoo Moghimi, Amir Mohammad Shabani, Hamideh Abbaspour Kasgari*
    This was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of Atazanavir/Ritonavir (ATZ/RTV) with Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in moderate Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus ATZ/RTV or LPV/RTV for a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 10 days. The primary outcomes were the reduced length of hospital stay and clinical recovery within 10 days from starting the intervention. The rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, and mortality, the lengths of ICU stay and being intubated, recovery within 14 days, and the frequency of adverse reactions was considered as secondary outcomes. Among 132 enrolled patients, 62 cases in each arm were analyzed at the end of the intervention. Fifty-one (82.3%) cases in the ATZ/RTV arm versus 41 (66.1%) in the LPV/RTV arm were discharged within 10 days (P = 0.06). The median number of the intervention days was 6 (IQR: 5-8) in ATZ/RTV arm versus 7 (IQR: 6-9) in LPV/RTV arm (P = 0.01). The rate and length of ICU admission and intubation (P ≥ 0.99), rate of mortality (P = 0.49), and recovery within 14 days (P = 0.09) were not statistically different between groups. The most reported adverse reactions were nausea and vomiting that all cases were in the LPV/RTV arm (P = 0.006). ATZ/RTV is better tolerated in comparison with LPV/RTV; however, it did not show more efficacies than LPV/RTV in clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in this study.
    Keywords: COVID-19, Atazanavir, Lopinavir, Hospital stay, Mortality, Safety
  • Alper Coskun, Bilal Eryildirim, Kemal Sarica, Emre Çamur, Utku Can, Erkin Saglam
    Purpose

    To evaluate the stone-free rates, quality of life, complications, use of fluoroscopy, analgesic requirements, a hospital stay following the management of lower calyceal with two different techniques (Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) in a prospective manner.

    Material and Methods

    50 patients with a diagnosis lower pole 1-2 cm stone were included into the study and were randomized into two groups.(Mini PCNL n: 25) ( RIRS n: 25). Safety and efficacy of both methods along with some other certain related factors were comparatively evaluated in both groups.

    Results

    There was no significant difference between preoperative stone size, stone to skin distance, hemogram and creatinine values, need for analgesic drug, patients' replies to visual analog scale (VAS). The duration of both the hospital stay and the exposure to fluoroscopy, hematocrit decrease due to hemorrhage, complication rates were significantly higher in cases undergoing mini PCNL when compared to RIRS. Additionally, any significant difference was not observed with respect to the stone-free rates. Despite an increase in quality of life following the both type operations was noted; there was no significant difference in the quality of life between the patients in both groups.

    Conclusion

    Our findings demonstrated that both surgical techniques are the feasible alternatives in the minimal invasive treatment of lower pole stones. Although there was no meaningful difference in stone-free rates between two groups; complications, use of fluoroscopy, bleeding and duration of hospital stay were noted to be significantly higher in cases treated with mini PCNL.

    Keywords: Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(Mini PCNL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS), visual analog scale (VAS), quality of life, fluoroscopy, hospital stay
  • Amir Hosein Ghazale, Ali Ghazvini, Mostafa Ghanei, Ensieh Vahedi, Shideh Omidian, Abolfazl Mozafari, Mohammad Rezapour, Nafiseh Rastgoo, Fatemeh Movaseghi, Fateme Mansouri, Mohammad Ali Zohal, Maryam Gheraati, Seyed Hassan Saadat, Hassan Goodarzi, Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki, Amir Mohammad Dehghan Banadkooki, Shahrzad Saloo, Hesamodin Salou
    Background

    COVID-19 is a new disease for which a definitive treatment has not yet been proposed. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of combination therapy on the treatment of COVID-19 due to the importance of finding an appropriate treatment for this epidemic disease.

    Materials and Methods

    This two-center cohort study included 175 confirmed COVID-19 inpatients at two medical centers designated for the treatment of COVID-19 patients in Qom and Qazvin, Iran. In this study, four different groups of drug regimens were studied which included G1 (azithromycin, prednisolone, and naproxen), G2 (lopinavir/ritonavir, azithromycin, naproxen, and prednisolone), G3 (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, naproxen, and prednisolone), and G4 (levofloxacin, vancomycin, hydroxychloroquine, and oseltamivir). It should be noted that G1, G2, G3, and G4 treatment regimens were used on 48, 39,30, and 77 patients, respectively.

    Results

    The study participants included 175 confirmed COVID-19 patients with mean±SD age of 58.9 ±15.1 years, out of whom 80 (46%) patients were male and the rest were females. The results indicated that the hospital stay period was significantly shorter in the G1 compared to other groups (G1:5.9±2.4, G2:8.1±4.2, G3: 6.3±1.7, and G4: 6.4±2.9; [P-value=0.008]). It should be noted that pulse rate, oxygen saturation, hemoglobin, and platelet count (PLT) changed significantly during the study in four treatment groups; however, a significant change in temperature, creatinine, and white blood cell (WBC) was observed only in G3, G4, and G1 groups, respectively. The number of ICU admissions and deaths were not statistically significant among the patients who received the four treatment regimens (P=0.785). Based on the results, the history of ischemic heart disease, baseline oxygen saturation, WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) are the risk factors for the prolonged hospital stay in COVID-19 patients.

    Conclusion

    The obtained results in this study indicated that the combination of azithromycin, prednisolone, and naproxen is the most effective regimen for the treatment of COVID-19, compared to three other combination treatment regimens.

    Keywords: Combination therapy, Coronavirus disease 2019, Hospital Stay
  • Diwakar Verma*, Nitesh Kumar, Anshul Jain, Binod Krishna Gouda, Suman Kumawat
    Background and Objectives

    The trauma is a major reason for various disabilities and even death around the world. Prompt actions and appropriate management are needed to minimize the level of injuries and mortality. An effective tool is needed to assess the prognosis of the patient in trauma. The objective of the study was to compare the evaluation of RTS and injury severity score (ISS) as a prognosis predictor among trauma patients.

    Methodology

    A cross‑sectional clinical observational study was conducted in the emergency department. A total of 88 samples were selected by random sampling technique. The data collection was done using demographic and clinical tools, Glasgow Coma Scale, Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and ISS. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 18.

    Results

    In the present study, the majority of the participants (79.54%) were male. The most common mode of injury among the patients was road traffic accidents (54.54%) with blunt trauma. The findings revealed a negative correlation (‒0.368) between RTS and ISS scores with significant P = 0.0004. RTS (<10) and ISS (≥20) have significant association with mortality and hospital stay. The sensitivities of ISS and RTS with mortality were 84.2% and 89.4%, respectively.

    Conclusion

    RTS is a comparatively better predictor of prognosis than ISS among trauma patients. Lower RTS and higher ISS are significantly associated with mortality and long hospital stay. Early evaluation of the injury level can be effective in patient management.

    Keywords: Hospital stay, injury severity score, mortality, prognosis, revised trauma score, trauma patient
  • Zahid Hussain Khan, Ali Alemran, Abbas Alipour, Maziar Maghsoudloo, Mojgan Rahimi, Mostafa Mohammady, Asghar Hajipour*
    Context

     Lumbar spine operations can be safely performed under general or neuroaxial anesthesia, but there are controversies as to the clinical outcomes and cost benefits of each method. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the advantages of each technique (i.e., regional or general anesthesia) for lumbar spine surgery with regards to cost, duration of surgery, duration of post anesthesia care unit, and duration of hospital stay.
    Data Sources: We conducted a systematic search for articles comparing regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for lumbar spine surgery using three major databases (i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar), without limitation for date and language of publication. We also manually double checked the references of all the related articles to detect missed articles by electronic searching. The last search was performed before September 2018; the quality of the included articles was assessed by different checklists according to the type of the article. STATA software (V. 10) was used for performing meta-analysis.

    Results

    Twenty-eight articles were included in this meta-analysis. Cost data were presented in seven studies and reported a significant decrease in the cost of treatment in RA patients compared with GA patients. The standard mean difference (SMD) (95% CI) for cost was 1.64 (1.53 to 1.75); z = 29.17; P < 0.001; I2 = 98.9. Surgical time data were presented in 25 studies, which reported significant reduction in the surgery time in RA patients compared with GA patients, the SMD (95% CI) for surgery time was 0.77 (0.71 to -0.84); z = 23.9; P < 0.001; I2 = 97.9. Post anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay data were presented in 16 studies and reported significant increase in PACU stay in RA patients compared with GA patients. The SMD (95% CI) for PACU stay time was -0.4 (-0.49 to -0.31); z = 8.65; P < 0.001; I2 = 99.2. Hospital stay data were presented in 18 studies and reported significant decrease in hospital stay time in RA patients compared with GA patients. The SMD (95% CI) for hospital stay time was 0.76 (0.68 to 0.84); z = 18.81.; P < 0.001; I2 = 98.3. Egger and Begg’s tests showed no significant publication bias.

    Conclusions

    This comprehensive systematic review showed that RA has several advantages over GA with respect to cost, surgery time, and duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, while increase in PACU stay time was observed in RA patients.

    Keywords: General Anesthesia, Cost, Regional Anesthesia, Hospital Stay, Spine Surgery, Surgical Time, Post Anesthesia Care Unit Time
  • Fatemeh Sadeghi, Mohammad Golitaleb, Ziae Totonchi, Mehdi Harorani, Rasoul Azarfarin*, Homan Bakhshande Abkenar
    Background

    A prolonged hospital stay causes bed occupancy rates and increases hospital costs. This study aimed to determine the factors affecting the ICU length of stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

    Methods

    In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 346 patients undergoing CABG between March 2015 and September 2016 were ed through convenience sampling. Based on their ICU length of stay, the patients were divided into 2 groups: ICU length of stay ≤ 72 hours (3 d) (Group A) and ICU length of stay > 72 hours (Group B).

    Results

    Among the 346 patients studied, 93 (27%) patients had an ICU length of stay ≥ 72 hours and 253 (73%) patients had an ICU length of stay < 72 hours. There was no statistically significant difference in the ICU length of stay between the women and men (P = 0.536). The subjects with a history of diabetes and hypertension were more likely to stay in the ICU for a longer period. For the patients with an ICU stay > 72 hours, the number of blood products received; the use of inotropes; the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass; the duration of intubation; cardiac, pulmonary, neural, and renal complications; infection, receiving inotropes in the ICU; postoperative bleeding; return to the operating room; receiving blood; and a history of bleeding were among the influential factors during the patients’ stay in the ICU.

    Conclusions

    The results of this study showed that the factors increasing the ICU length of stay after CABG were old age, a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, a prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, receiving inotropes, prolonged intubation, the use of the intra-aortic balloon pump, receiving blood products, and postoperative bleeding. 

    Keywords: Coronary artery bypass grafting, Intensive care unit, Hospital stay, Cardiac surgery
  • Mohammad Bagher Rahmati*, Alireza Nikbakht, Mehran Ahmadi
    Background
    Acute gastroenteritis is one of the major causes of pediatric hospitalization and mortality worldwide. Vitamin D can improve the immune system, and its deficiency may exacerbate the severe symptoms of any infectious disease. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D on children admitted to a hospital due to acute gastroenteritis.
    Methods
    In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 100 children aged 3 months to 14 years old hospitalized due to acute gastroenteritis in Bandar Abbas pediatric hospital, Iran, were enrolled. The participants were divided into two groups of case and placebo (n = 50 per group). Patients were excluded from the study if they met the exclusion criteria. After obtaining parental (or guardian) consent, in addition to the conventional treatment of gastroenteritis, the placebo group received 2 cc of olive oil (as placebo) and the cases received 100000 IU of vitamin D (ZAHRAVI Vit D3). Discharge criteria included reduction of fever and defecation and improvement of the patient’s general condition. The required data including age, sex, baseline serum vitamin D level, level of dehydration, axillary temperature, and length of hospital stay were recorded in a checklist by a physician. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and Student’s t-test were used to compare the recorded data in SPSS, version 24.
    Results
    The mean lengths of hospital stay were 3.46 and 2.54 days in the placebo and case groups, respectively, indicating a significant difference between the two groups in this regard (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant age and sex differences between the two groups regarding hospital stay (P = 0.09 and P = 0.14). Furthermore, there was no significant relationship between length of hospital stay and the level of dehydration in either group (P = 0.15). We found that axillary temperature at discharge was significantly lower in the vitamin D group than the placebo group (P = 0.017). In general, length of hospital stay was shorter in the vitamin D group, and there was no difference between patients with baseline vitamin D level of < 30 ng/mL and those with vitamin D level of ≥ 30 ng/mL in the vitamin D group regarding length of hospital stay (P = 0.057). On the contrary, in placebo group, hospital stay was significantly longer in those with vitamin D level of < 30 ng/mL (P = 0.039).
    Conclusions
    This prospective study demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation is significantly related to the reduction of hospital stay in pediatric acute gastroenteritis patients aged 3 months to 14 years old. This finding was achieved after unification of the confounding variables such as socioeconomic status. We also noted that the effect of vitamin D on hospital stay was not associated with age, sex, and level of dehydration.
    Keywords: Gastroenteritis, Vitamin D, Hospital Stay, Pediatrics
  • Zahra Meidani, Mehrdad Farzandipour, Mehrdad Hosseinpour, Davood Kheirkhah, Manizheh Shekarchi, Shahla Rafiei
    Background
    Hospital beds are among valuable resources for care delivery. Therefore, optimum use of them is crucial for increasing the efficiency of health-care services and controlling health-care costs.
    Objective
    This study intended to evaluate inappropriate patient stay (IPS) in hospital settings and its reasons based on the appropriateness evaluation protocol.
    Methods
    This cross-sectional study was conducted on 335 patients hospitalized in a tertiary care university hospital. Data were gathered prospectively by 13 hospital nurses during a 6-month period. IPS rate was evaluated using a checklist, the 27 criteria of which were related to medical services, nursing/life support services, and patient's conditions. Moreover, a 12-item checklist was used to determine physician-, hospital-, and patient/family-related factors behind inappropriate hospital stay.
    Results
    In total, 121 of 1925 (6.3%) hospitalization days of 335 patients were determined to be inappropriate. Neurosurgery and gynecology wards had the highest and the lowest inappropriate hospital stay rates (22.5% vs. 0%), respectively. The main reasons behind inappropriate hospital stay were hospital-related factors (33.1%), physician-related factors (29.1%), and patient-related factors (21.3%).
    Conclusion
    A wide variety of physician-, hospital-, and patient/family-related factors contribute to IPS. Given the multifactorial causes of IPS, reducing its rate necessitates multidisciplinary approaches.
    Keywords: Appropriateness evaluation protocol, Bed utilization, Health‑care costs, Hospital stay, Nurses, Utilization review
  • Siavash Falahatkar, Gholamreza Mokhtari *, Mojtaba Teimoori
    Purpose
    To compare results of studies on supine and prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques to find the best position for treating kidney stones.
    Materials And Methods
    A systematic literature review was done in April 2016 using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify the relevant studies. Article selection was based on the preferred reporting elements of systematic reviews and meta-analysis criteria. A subgroup analysis was done comparing standard prone and supine PCNLs separately.
    Results
    Twenty studies were selected for the analysis including 7733 PCNL cases: 2110 cases were (27.3%) in supine and 5623 cases were (72.7%) in prone position. Supine and prone PCNL had a similar stone-free rate (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 070-1.27; P = 0.73), operation time (difference in means = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.03; P = .53), hospital stay (differencein means = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.03; P = .52), complication rate (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.76-1.02; P = .09) and urinary leakage (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.50-2.59; P = .75). However, patients received less blood transfusion (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55-0.94; P = .01) and had less fever rates (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.80; P
    Conclusion
    Supine PCNL has similar stone-free rate, operation time, and hospital stay relative to prone PCNL. However, the supine position has the advantage of less fever and need for blood transfusion. Although both prone and supine PCNLs are suggested for treatment, supine PCNL may have advantages especially in patients with comorbidity.
    Keywords: complication, hospital stay, operative time, prone, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, stone free rate, supine
  • Amin Torabipour, Hojjat Zeraati, Mohammad Arab, Arash Rashidian, Ali Akbari Sari, Mahmuod Reza Sarzaiem
    Background
    To determine the hospital required beds using stochastic simulation approach in cardiac surgery departments.
    Methods
    This study was performed from Mar 2011 to Jul 2012 in three phases: First, collection data from 649 patients in cardiac surgery departments of two large teaching hospitals (in Tehran, Iran). Second, statistical analysis and formulate a multivariate linier regression model to determine factors that affect patient's length of stay. Third, develop a stochastic simulation system (from admission to discharge) based on key parameters to estimate required bed capacity.
    Results
    Current cardiac surgery department with 33 beds can only admit patients in 90.7% of days. (4535 d) and will be required to over the 33 beds only in 9.3% of days (efficient cut off point). According to simulation method, studied cardiac surgery department will requires 41-52 beds for admission of all patients in the 12 next years. Finally, one-day reduction of length of stay lead to decrease need for two hospital beds annually.
    Conclusion
    Variation of length of stay and its affecting factors can affect required beds. Statistic and stochastic simulation model are applied and useful methods to estimate and manage hospital beds based on key hospital parameters.
    Keywords: Hospital beds, Cardiac surgery department, Hospital stay, Stochastic simulation
  • احسان الله کلته، شاکر سالاری لک *، علی تقی زاده افشاری، حمیدرضا خلخالی
    پیش زمینه و هدف
    دستیابی به نتایج بهتر با پیوند کلیه از اهداکنندگان زنده، منجر به گسترش استفاده از این روش پیوندی شده است؛ اما یکی از معایب بزرگ پیوند از دهنده زنده آن است که دهنده کلیه باید تحت یک جراحی عمده قرار بگیرد که با احتمال میرایی و عوارض بعد از عمل همراه است. مدت زمان بستری بعد از عمل مقیاسی برای بیان نتایج و عواقب سلامتی محسوب شده و به عنوان یکی از مهم ترین عوامل تعیین کننده ی هزینه پیوند نیز شناخته شده است. لذا مطالعه حاضر باهدف بررسی اثرات وضعیت جمعیت شناختی، سوابق پزشکی و بالینی اهداءکنندگان زنده کلیه پیوندی قبل از اهداء بر مدت زمان بستری آن ها بعد از عمل جراحی نفرکتومی، در مرکز پیوند بیمارستان امام خمینی ارومیه در فاصله سال های 1376 تا 1393 انجام گردید.
    مواد و روش کار
    در یک مطالعه هم گروهی گذشته نگر داده های 1463 اهداکننده زنده کلیه در دوره زمانی 1376 تا 1393 در مرکز پیوند بیمارستان امام خمینی (ره) ارومیه مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. برای سنجش رابطه متغیرهای دموگرافیک، یافته های بالینی و نیز سوابق سلامتی افراد قبل از اهدا با مدت زمان بستری بعد از عمل جراحی نفرکتومی از آزمون من ویتنی استفاده گردید.
    یافته ها
    1367 مورد (4/93درصد) از اهداءکنندگان مرد و 96 مورد (6/6درصد) زن بودند. میانگین سن، فشارخون سیستولیک، دیاستولیک (قبل از نفرکتومی) و مدت زمان بستری بعد از عمل جراحی نفرکتومی به ترتیب 34/5±92/27 سال، 5/10±12/112 و 89/8±28/71 میلی متر جیوه و 96/0±14/3 روز بود. شیوع مصرف دخانیات، فشارخون بالا، سوابق بستری و دارویی قبلی در اهداءکنندگان به ترتیب 2/61درصد، 3درصد، 4/27درصد و 7/5درصد بود. سن بالاتر از 40 سال (001/0 P<)، جنس زن (05/0P<)، عدم مصرف دخانیات (001/0 P<)، نداشتن سابقه بستری قبل از اهداء (01/0 P<)، داشتن رابطه خویشاوندی نسبی با گیرنده (001/0 P<) و اهداء کلیه ی سمت راست (05/0P<) از عواملی محسوب می شوند که باعث افزایش مدت زمان بستری بعد از عمل جراحی نفرکتومی می گردند.
    بحث و نتیجه گیری
    توصیه می شود برای به حداقل رساندن مدت زمان بستری بعد از عمل، از اهداءکنندگان جوان تر از 40 سال و دارای جنسیت مرد استفاده گردد.
    کلید واژگان: کلیه, پیوند کلیه, اهداءکنندگان زنده, نفرکتومی, طول مدت بستری
    Ehsan Allah Kalteh, Shaker Salarilak *, Ali Taghizadeh Afshari, Hamid Reza Khalkhali
    Background and Aims
    The superior results achieved with kidney transplantation from living donors have resulted in an increase in this method of transplantation. But donors need to have a major operative procedure that is associated with morbidity and mortality. Duration of hospitalization after surgery is a measure to express health consequences as well as one of the most important determinants of the cost of the transplant. Therefore, this study aimed to study the demographic status, medical history and clinical living donor kidney prior to donation and related factors the duration of hospitalization after nephrectomy in transplant center of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia.
    Materials and Methods
    We conducted a retrospective cohort study that was conducted on 1463 living donors who were operated in transplant center of Imam Khomeini Hospital, between 21March 1996 to 19 March 2015. Associations between demographic variables and clinical findings before kidney donation and health history of patients with duration of hospitalization after kidney donation were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test
    Results
    There were 1367 (93.4%) male and 96 (6.6%) female donors. The mean donation age, systolic blood pressure, Diastolic (Nephrectomy before) and after nephrectomy duration of hospitalization were 27.92±5.34 years, 112.12 ±10.5 &71.28±8.89 mmHg and 3.14±0.96 days, respectively. The prevalence of tobacco use, hypertension, hospitalization history and drug was 61.2%, 3%, 27.4% and 5.7%, respectively. Being older than 40 years (p
    Conclusion
    It is recommended to minimize the duration of hospitalization for donors after surgery, using male gender younger than 40 years old.
    Keywords: Kidney, Kidney transplantation, Living donors, Nephrectomy, Hospital stay
  • Fatemeh Mohammaddoost, Ziba Mosayebi, Hamid Peyrovi, Minoo, Mitra Chehrzad, Abbas Mehran
    Background
    The readiness of mothers to take care for infants at discharge is a critical issue. Poor readiness of mothers in taking care of premature infants at the time of discharge is associated with potential adverse consequences. This study examined the effect of implementing mothers’ empowerment program on the weight gain and duration of hospitalization in premature infants.
    Materials And Methods
    This study was a quasi-experimental before–after study with a control group, in which 80 mothers with premature infants who were hospitalized in NICU Level II of two hospitals were recruited in the study. Mothers’ empowerment program was implemented as a three-stage training program for the intervention group. Mothers’ readiness questionnaire was
    completed by the mothers before the intervention and at the discharge time. The changes in mean of mothers’ readiness scores were compared in both the groups.
    Results
    The mean of daily weight gain in infants of the intervention group (3.95 g) was significantly higher than that of the infants in the control group (−0.9 g) (P = 0.003). The average duration of hospitalization for infants in the intervention and control groups was 15.45 days and 20.95 days, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.003).
    Conclusions
    Providing training to the mothers regarding how to care for premature infants can be a useful and effective method in the process of weight gain of premature and low-birth newborns, and may shorten the duration of infants’ hospitalization.
    Keywords: Duration of hospitalization, empowerment, empowerment program, hospital stay, infant, intensive care unit, neonatal, premature, premature infant, weight gain
  • Vahid Shamsi, Masoud Sirati Nir Sirati Nir, Hosein Babatabar Darzi, Hosein Mahmoudi*
    Background

    In recent decades, the increasing crowdedness of the emergency departments has posed various problems for patients and healthcare systems worldwide. These problems include prolonged hospital stay, patient dissatisfaction and nurse burnout or job dissatisfaction.

    Objectives

    The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of emergency department (ED) nurses’ job specialization on their job satisfaction and the length of patient stay in the ED.

    Patients and Methods

    This before-after quasi-experimental study was conducted from April to May 2014 at the Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Initially, 35 patients were recruited as controls and the length of their stay in the ED was measured in minutes via a chronometer; Moreover, nurses’ job satisfaction was evaluated using the Mohrman-Cooke-Mohrman job satisfaction scale. Then, a job specialization intervention was developed based on the stabilization model. After that, 35 new patients were recruited to the treatment group and received specialized care services. Accordingly, the length of their stay in the ED was measured. Moreover, the same nurses’ job satisfaction was re-evaluated after the study. The study intervention lasted one month. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 20 and statistical tests such as the Kolmogrov-Smirnov, the paired and the independent t, and chi-square tests.

    Results

    There was a significant difference between the two groups of patients concerning the length of their stay in the ED (P < 0.001). Moreover, compared with the pretest readings, nurses had greater job satisfaction after the study (P < 0.001).

    Conclusions

    The job specialization intervention can improve nurses’ satisfaction and relieve the crowdedness of the EDs.

    Keywords: Hospital Stay, Nurses, Job Satisfaction, Stabilization Model, Iran
  • Gaurav Singla, Harmesh Singh Bains, Ravinder Soni
    Objective
    To predict hospital stay by using various clinical parameters at admission.Patients and
    Methods
    This prospective observational study was conducted over a period of one year (Jan – Dec 2010) in a tertiary level teaching hospital in North India. Out of 344 neonates admitted, 41 left against medical advice and were excluded. At time of admission, initial vital signs were noted along with basic information. All neonates were assessed on the basis of clinical parameters and followed up to the discharge/death. Final outcome was noted in terms of total duration of hospital stay in survived and non survived neonates. In the statistical analysis, Odds ratio along with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each parameter and significant associations (p value ≤ 0.05) were studied.
    Results
    Of 30 clinical variables, 18 were found to be significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization viz more than 7days in survived neonates. These include abnormal heart rate (>160/min or <100/min), abnormal respiratory rate (>60/min or <30/min), abnormal SpO2 (<90%), prolonged capillary filling time (≥3seconds), moderate hypothermia or hyperthermia, decreased consciousness level, abnormal quality of cry, reduced or no activity, presence of pallor, icterus involving soles, central cyanosis, dehydration, chest recessions, respiratory distress, abdominal distension, hypotonia and incomplete or absent Moro’s reflex in term neonates and absent or sluggish deep tendon reflexes. Similarly, three parameters were found to be significantly associated with death of non survived neonates within 7 days of hospital stay- abnormal respiratory rate (>60/min or <30/min), abnormal SpO2 (<90%), prolonged capillary filling time (≥3seconds).
    Conclusion
    Hospital stay of the neonate can be predicted at time of admission using these simple, easily assessed, promptly at bedside clinical parameters.
    Keywords: Clinical parameters, hospital stay, neonates, tertiary care hospital
  • سید محمد حسینی کسنویه، مجتبی چهاردولی، حامد بصیر غفوری، علیرضا صدقی، طیب رمیم*
    زمینه و هدف
    آسیب های شریانی در ناحیه دست در صورت شدید بودن می توانند تهدید کننده حیات اندام و حتی حیات فرد باشند. این مطالعه با هدف بررسی نحوه اداره بیماران دچار آسیب های حاد شریان رادیال یا اولنار در اورژانس انجام شد.
    روش بررسی
    مطالعه به صورت مقطعی در بیماران مراجعه کننده به اورژانس بیمارستان سینا، تهران در سال 1391 انجام شد. داشتن علائم حیاتی پایدار، لاسراسیون ناحیه مچ دست و ساعد همراه با خونریزی جهنده یا اکتیو، تشخیص آسیب یکی از شریان های رادیال یا اولنار یا هر دو از معیارهای ورود به مطالعه بودند. کنترل علائم حیاتی، سطح هوشیاری، صدمات همراه و معاینه بالینی عمومی و تخصصی در تمام بیماران انجام گردید. زمان ورود بیمار به اورژانس و زمان اقدامات انجام شده از جمله اقدامات درمانی اولیه و ثانویه و همچنین زمان انجام مشاوره ها و ویزیت های بعدی از لحظه ورود به اورژانس تا زمان ترخیص بیمار از اورژانس یا بخش ثبت گردید.
    یافته ها
    50 بیمار(3 زن و 47 مرد) با میانگین سنی 9/69 ± 30/34 سال وارد مطالعه شدند. اولین اقدام بررسی محل خونریزی و پک کردن ناحیه بود. بیشترین نوع آسیب از برنده با جسم تیز(84%) و بیشترین شریان درگیر، شریان رادیال(68%) بود.میانگین زمان اولین اقدام درمانی0/93±1/24 دقیقه بود. از نظر نوع روش درمانی37 نفر از 50 نفر(74%) تحت لیگاسیون قرار گرفته و 13 نفر(26%) جهت ترمیم و آناستوموز توسط جراح عروق به اتاق عمل فرستاده شدند. میانگین زمانی لیگاسیون در گروه طب اورژانس 13/83± 16/72 دقیقه و در گروه جراحی عروق 114 ± 117/76 دقیقه بود که اختلاف معنی دار را نشان داد (0/000=p). مدت زمان کلی اقامت در بیمارستان برای بیماران شرکت کننده در مطالعه 82/74± 69/04 ساعت بود (311- 5 ساعت).
    نتیجه گیری
    نتایج نشان داد که انجام لیگاسیون شریان رادیال یا اولنار در اورژانس با در نظر گرفتن اندیکاسیون ها و کنترااندیکاسیون های آن می تواند نقش مهمی در بازیابی وضعیت همودینامیک بیمار و تسریع در اقدامات درمانی بعدی بیمار داشته باشد.
    کلید واژگان: شریان رادیال, شریان اولنار, لیگاسیون, ترمیم, زمان اقامت در بیمارستان
    Dr Seyed Mohammad Hossieni Kasnavieh, Dr Mojtaba Chahardoli, Dr Hamed Basir Ghafouri, Dr Alireza Sedghi, Dr Tayeb Ramim
    Background And Aim
    Severe arterial injuries in the hand can be hazardous to the limbs and even life- threatening. The aim of this study was to investigate the management methods in the patients with acute injuries of the ulnar or radial artery in the emergency department.
    Material And Methods
    This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted in the emergency department of Sina Hospital in Tehran, from 2012 to 2013. Stable vital signs, wrist and forearm laceration with jumper or active bleeding, radial or ulnar artery injury; one or both were among our inclusion criteria. Vital signs, level of consciousness, coincident injuries were assessed and physical examination was performed in all patients. We recorded time of patient arrival, primary and secondary treatment, and consultation and follow up visits in emergency department or ward.
    Results
    50 patients (3 females and 47 males) with a mean age of 30.34y ± 9.69y were enrolled. The first step was to examine and pack up bleeding. The most common injury was due to sharp instruments (84%) and the most common injured artery was radial artery (68%).The mean duration of the first treatment was 1.24 ± 0.93 min. 37 patients (74%) were treated by ligation in the emergency room and the remaining 13 patients (26%) were sent to the operating room for repair and vascular anastomosis by our vascular surgeon. Mean values of duration for ligation were 16.72 ± 13.83 min and 117.76 ± 114 min in emergency medicine and vascular surgery groups, respectively that showed a significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.0001). The overall duration of hospitalization for the patients was 69.04 ± 82.74 hour (5- 311 hours).
    Conclusions
    We can conclude that the radial or ulnar artery ligation considering its indications or contraindications, in emergency room can play an important role in the recovery of patient's hemodynamic status and speed up of the next step of patient’s treatment.
    Keywords: Radial artery, Ulnar artery, Ligation, Repair, Hospital stay
  • عاطفه شمسی*، زینب موحدی، بتول پورابولی، صدیقه ایرانمنش
    زمینه و هدف
    از جمله مشکلات عدیده ای که نوزاد نارس بعد از تولد با آن مواجه می باشد، ضعف مهارت های حرکتی دهان و عدم توانایی تغذیه از سینه مادر است. اقدامات مداخله ای ساده مانند تحریک بویایی می تواند در تسریع دستیابی به این مهارت که یکی از چالش های فزاینده در بخش های مراقبت های ویژه نوزادان است، کمک کننده باشد. بنابراین مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین اثربخشی بوی شیر مادر بر زمان انتقال تغذیه نوزاد نارس به تغذیه دهانی انجام شد.
    مواد و روش ها
    این کارآزمایی بالینی بر روی 92 نوزاد نارس با سن حاملگی کمتر از 33 هفته در بخش های مراقبت های ویژه نوزادان بیمارستان های ولی عصر(عج) و جامع زنان تهران از اردیبهشت تا شهریور سال 1392 انجام شد. نمونه گیری به روش در دسترس به طور تصادفی از نمونه های دو گروه 46 نفره کنترل و مداخله (دریافت کننده تحریک بوی شیر مادر در زمان های گاواژ) صورت گرفت. برای جمع آوری اطلاعات از چک لیستی استفاده شد که شامل اطلاعات دموگرافیک و متغیرهای اصلی مورد مطالعه (طول مدت انتقال تغذیه از گاواژ به تغذیه دهانی، وزن گیری، طول مدت بستری و طول مدت اولین تغذیه نوزاد از سینه مادر) بود. اطلاعات توسط نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 16 و با استفاده از آزمون های آماری تی مستقل و من ویتنی تجزیه و تحلیل شد.
    یافته ها
    میانگین طول دوره انتقال در گروه مداخله 23/3 ± 20/11 و در گروه کنترل 04/6 ± 65/21 روز بود (001/0 > P). همچنین، میانگین طول مدت بستری در گروه مداخله 57/3 ± 65/14 و در گروه کنترل 50/6 ± 20/26 روز بود (001/0 > P). در مورد گروه مداخله تغذیه از سینه مادر نیز در مدت کمتری صورت گرفت (001/0 > P).
    نتیجه گیری
    با توجه به کاهش مدت زمان انتقال از گاواژ به تغذیه دهانی در گروه مداخله، استفاده از این روش ساده و کم هزینه به مادران جهت تسریع دستیابی نوزاد به توانمندی تغذیه ای پیشنهاد می شود.
    کلید واژگان: بوی شیر مادر, نوزاد نارس, مدت زمان انتقال تغذیه, طول مدت بستری, تغذیه دهانی
    Atefeh Shamsi *
    Background And Objective
    One of the problems of premature infants is oral muscles insufficiency and inadequacy of oral-feeding skills at birth. Use of supportive oral interventions such as olfactory stimulation can facilitate this increasing challenge in neonatal intensive care unit. This study aimed to check the effect of olfactory stimulation with breast milk smell on the duration of feeding transitional time from gavage to oral feeding in premature infants.
    Materials And Method
    In this randomized clinical trial study، 92 premature infants with the gestational age of less than 33 weeks hospitalized in neonatal intensive-care units of Valiasr and Jame Zanan hospitals in Tehran، Iran، during April to September 2013 were enrolled using available sampling method. They were randomly divided into 2 groups of 46، control and intervention (received mother milk odor during gavage periods) groups. A researcher-made checklist including demographic and primary (transitional feeding time، weighting، first breast feeding time، hospital stay) variables was used. The data were analyzed using independent t and Mann-Whitney tests via SPSS16 software.
    Results
    Olfactory stimulation of premature infants significantly reduced the feeding transitional time and length of hospitalization more in intervention group (11. 20 ± 3. 23 and 14. 65 ± 3. 57 days، respectively) compared to control group (21. 65 ± 6. 04 and 26. 20 ± 6. 50 days، respectively) (P < 0. 001 for both). Starting the first breast-feeding from mother''s breast was done more effectively in a shorter time in intervention group، too (P < 0. 001).
    Conclusion
    According to reducing the gavage to oral feeding transitional time، training this simple and low-cost method to mothers can be effective in improving the quality of feeding in premature infants.
    Keywords: Breast milk smell, premature infant, transitional feeding time, hospital stay, oral feeding
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال