جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « حلیت » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

The aim of the current study was to assess the agreement of the religious halal norm with difference in histamine, urea, and methanol levels as well of selected aquatic animal species. Samples of Arius maculatus, Atule mate, Cynoglossus bilineatus, Planiliza macrolepis, Portunus pelagicus, Rhinoptera javanica, Saccostrea cuccullata, and Sphyraena putnamae were obtained from the Chabahar Bay. The concentrations of total protein, histamine, and urea were estimated in dorsal muscle of fish, claw muscle of Portunus pelagicus, and soft tissue of the Sccostrea cuccullata samples, using the ELIZA method. Colorimetric kits were used for methanol determination. Comparison of the mean urea concentrations amongst examined species indicated significantly higher levels of urea in haram species (W= 167.5, p= 0.013). Mean histamine levels on the other hand, were not significantly different between halal and haram food (F= 2.61, p= 0.11). Yet, histamine content in R. javanica fried flesh was more elevated compared to halal food. Also Protein levels were considerably decreased in cooked R. javanica meat. Methanol concentration was lower than the detection limit in all samples. We speculated that the cooked food should be considered for assessing the agreement level between halal norm with food quality. Colorimetric kit was used to detect methanol in samples.

 The issue of respect for the property of others is one of the most fundamental issues that has negative effects on human life in individual and social extents and in religious teachings, especially in the Qur'an, respect for other people's property and prohibition of possession without permission is recommended and is an important rule in fiqh. The purpose of this research, is the expression of the origin and reasoning the legislation of legitimacy as well as the causes of legitimacy is based on verses and hadiths and the views of jurists.

 This study tries to explain the causes of hillat from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence by using verses and hadiths and related books. This research has been done by library study method and the necessary information has been collected and analyzed; Therefore, the research method in this article is descriptive-analytical.

 According to religious teachings, seizing other people's property is not allowed and it is forbidden by Shariah. Any seizure of other people's property must be within the framework of religious laws and regulations. This is a rational rule that is approved by Sharia. According to the study done in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, the origin of Hillat law, which is one of the Sharia rules, is God, and the philosophy of Hillat law from the perspective of the Qur'an is purity, existence of benefit, removal of fault and prevention of harm. Also, the causes of hillat are based on Quranic verses, traditions and views of Imamiyya jurists, including; God's permission, lack of capacity to commit, excuse, permission of the owner or guardian, permission contracts and property assets have been explained.

The first principle in seizing other people's property is sanctity based on religious teachings, and any seizure of other people's property must be within the framework of religious laws and regulations. This is a rational rule, which is approved by the Shariah, and also the origin of Hillat legislation, which is one of the Shariah rules is God, and the wisdom of the legislation of Hillat and the means of Hillat is expressed from the perspective of the Qur'an.

In today's society, one of the seafood served in some restaurants is lobster. However, it is not permissible according to the Shia religion and some Sunni religions, and it is only allowed to be used in some Islamic religions. Therefore, in some Islamic countries, this crab is found in restaurants. But in Iran, according to the rules of the country and Jafari Shia jurisprudence is not allowed. However, according to the famous saying of the jurists, the halal quality of aquatic animals is limited to scaly fish and shrimp.

As a result, due to the special need to study this issue, the present study has explained this in a descriptive-analytical manner.

The findings of the present study indicate that the independent nature of lobster compared to shrimp and crabs, is among the unspecified aquatic animals in religious jurisprudence.

As a result, if we consider lobster as a different nature of these species, then, according to the famous saying, its halal properties is problematic. Consequently, serving lobster while it has haraam quality is an example of ignoring the sharia rules in Islamic society.

Today, many Muslims live in non-Muslim countries and naturally have to use vital resources and facilities to continue living there. One of these sources is practicing usury from non-Muslim monetary and financial institutions in those countries. Permission or prohibition of that is one of the major challenges for Muslims in those countries. In Shi'a jurisprudence, different theories have been put forward in explaining the permission (Helleiiat) of usury; the theory of not aiming the borrowing by Muslims, the theory of Trophy, the theory of seeking to extricate, the theory of necessity and the lack of hardship. This paper, by critically rethinking and rejecting the four mentioned theories, analyzes and permits the usury from non-Muslim monetary and financial institutions through the theory of real power and the purchase of money and its financial and exchange value. According to this theory, if the aforementioned power and value do not change in the short term, the permission of such facilities will be explained by the theory of necessity and lack of hardship.

Iron is a very important mineral for health. The role of Iron in the biological processes of our body is vital and undeniable, and the use of it in the diet and drug supplements of pregnant women can have a special effect on maintaining their health and well-being. It comes from some Islamic rules such as "necessity of prevention of probable harm" and "the necessity between the rule of reason and the rule  of the shari'a". In order to develop  Islamic laws and jurisprudence, it is necessary to consider the views of medical practitioners as well as Islamic scholars. But on the other hand, some  recommend not to use iron tabletspeaple ,based on traditional medicine, which can lead to a deficiency of this vital ingredient in pregnant women. Therefor, it causes irreparable harm such as neonatal death, Low birth weight (LBW) and neonatal diseases such as autism. So, according to the reason and Shari'a, the consumption of the Iron is sufficient for pregnant women, otherwise they  will face physical and psychological disturbances. This paper has tried to explain the permissiblity of the use of Iron by pregnant women from the Islamic point of view by using the verses and narrations of the infallibles.

Cloned meat is a kind of animal meat that is processed and prodeced using stem cells and muscle cells. Whether or not consumption of such food is Halal is one of the ptoblems associated with processed food. Developement of new and different methods/techniques in processing and producing food and the necessity of keeping these methods in accordance with Islamic Sharia makes clear the importance of answering to the question of whether or not consuming cloned meat is Halal.

Research method in this study is analytic and TATBIGHI. The principles and measures related to the subject in the islamic/ religoius society are clarified and related islamic principles/ rules that are relevant from the view point of fiqh and Islamic law are discusses.

There is a division of ideas on this issue among the Islamic scholars and foqaha. One group worried about the possible dangers of the issue habe either chosen caution or has forbidden consumption of such food. The other group, however, based on the principles of BARAAT and HELLIAT has ageed to the consumption of cloned meat and have declared it halal. Given the current status and based on the studies done so far, it seems that in the current time, considering the necesseties of the country and taking into account the principle of "don't be under the control of infidels" if cloned meat is proven to be harmless and if the original cells are obtained from an animal with halal meat, such meat can be declared halal.