به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Inducible Resistance » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

  • Zahra Jahanbakhshi, Jamileh Nowroozi, Zahra Kahrarian, Azin Tariniya Gilani, Mohadeseh Ahmadvand, Nasrollah Sohrabi *
    Background

     Staphylococcus aureus is the most common agent of nosocomial infections. Macrolide Lincosamide-Streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics are the therapeutic choices for treatment of infections due to methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. The most frequent mechanism for inducible resistance in S. aureus is modification in target site by erm (erythromycin ribosome methylase) genes.

    Objectives

     The aim of this research was to determine inducible MLSB (iMLSB) and detection the erm genes in clinical samples of S. aureus isolated from hospitalized patients in the Imam Reza hospital of Kermanshah, west of Iran.

    Methods

     This study performed on 126 samples of S. aureus. Identification of isolates were performed using microbiological and biochemical procedures. Inducible resistance to clindamycin was tested by D-test. The prevalence of genes, such as femB, mecA, ermA and ermB was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

    Results

     Eighty-three cases (65.9%) of isolates were methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The resistance rate against erythromycin and clindamycin was 67.4% and 52.2%, respectively. Totally, 49 cases (38.9%) of isolates were resistant to both erythromycin and clindamycin indicating constitutive MLSB phenotype (cMLSB); 20 cases (15.9%) isolates showed positive D test indicating inducible MLSB phenotype (iMLSB), while 16 cases (12.7%) were negative for D test indicating MS phenotype. Among 20 cases with iMLSB phenotype, ermC and ermA genes were showed in 7 cases (35%) and 4 cases (20%) isolates, respectively. The ermB gene is not detected in any cases and 9 cases (45%) isolates did not have any erm genes.

    Conclusions

     In general, findings of this study showed high frequency of resistance to clindamycin and erythromycin among S. aureus isolates and cMLSB to be the most pattern phenotype and ermC gene is the most common gene in iMLSB phenotype. Because variation of antimicrobial resistance pattern in geographic regions obtaining local results is useful for detecting and more appropriate control of nosocomial infection due to S. aureus isolates.

    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Inducible Resistance, Clindamycin, erma}
  • علی هاشمی *، ثمین جابری، عارف شریعتی، زهره قلاوند، فرحنوش دوستدار، نرجس بستان قدیری، سعید شمس، نیلوفر مسعودی، الهام عباسی
    زمینه و هدف
    ظهور سویه های مقاوم به آنتی بیوتیک باکتری استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس، چالش بزرگی در درمان عفونت های ناشی از این باکتری ایجاد کرده و مقاومت القایی به کلیندامایسین نیز موجب نقص درمان شده است. این مطالعه با هدف شناسایی مقاومت القایی به کلیندامایسین در سویه های استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس جداشده از بیماران بستری در بیمارستان های شهر تهران صورت گرفت.
    روش بررسی
    این مطالعه به روش توصیفی بر روی 80 ایزوله استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس جداشده از بیماران بستری در بیمارستان های شهر تهران انجام شد. حساسیت ایزوله ها به آنتی بیوتیک های مختلف با روش دیسک دیفیوژن بررسی گردید. مقاومت القایی سویه ها به کلیندامایسین با استفاده از D-Zone Test صورت گرفت. وجود ژن های ermA، ermB، ermC با PCR Multiplex ارزیابی شد.
    یافته ها
    در این مطالعه، از بین80 ایزوله استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس، 70% سویه ها به اریترومایسین و 45% به کلیندامایسین مقاوم بودند. با استفاده از تست D-Zone، 15 نمونه، مثبت گزارش شد. در بین 80 ایزوله، ژن های ermA، ermB، ermC به ترتیب در (10%) 8، (5/7%) 6 و (5%) 4 سویه مشاهده گردید.
    نتیجه گیری
    با توجه به نتایج این مطالعه، شیوع مقاومت آنتی بیوتیکی، موجب نگرانی است؛ از این رو برای کنترل عفونت و جلوگیری از گسترش باکتری های مقاوم به دارو، نیاز به مدیریت دقیق در تجویز دارو و شناسایی ایزوله های مقاوم می باشد.
    کلید واژگان: استافیلوکوک اورئوس, کلیندامایسین, اریترومایسین, مقاومت القایی}
    Ali Hashemi *, Samin Jaberi, Aref Shariati, Zohreh Ghalavand, Narjes Bostan Ghadiri, Farahnoosh Doustdar, Saeed Shams, Nilofar Massoudi, Elham Abbasi
    Background And Objectives
    The emergence of antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus has created a major challenge in the treatment of infections caused by this bacterium, and inducible clindamycin resistance has also led to treatment failure. This study was performed with the aim of identification of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in hospitals of Tehran city.
    Methods
    This descriptive study was conducted on 80 Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients hospitalized in hospitals of Tehran city. The susceptibility of the isolates to different antibiotics, were investigated using disk diffusion method. Inducible clindamycin resistance of the strains was identified using D-zone test. The presence of ermA, ermB, and ermC genes were evaluated by multiplex PCR.
    Results
    In this study, among 89 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 70% of the strains were resistant to erythromycin and 45% to clindamycin. Using D-zone test, 15 samples were reported positive. Among the 80 isolates, ermA, ermB, and ermC genes were observed in 4 (5%), 6 (7.5%) and 8 (10%) strains, respectively.
    Conclusion
    Given the results of this study, the prevalence of antibiotic resistance is a matter of concern; hence, there is a need for accurate management of drug prescription and identification of resistant isolates to control the infection and prevent the spread of resistant bacteria.
    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Clindamycin, Erythromycin, Inducible resistance}
  • Hossein Sedaghat, Bahram Nasr Esfahani, Sina Mobasherizadeh, Azhar Sallari Jazi, Mehrdad Halaji, Parisa Sadeghi, Mohammad Emaneini, Seyed Asghar Havaei
    Background And Objectives
    Macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B (MLSB) are noteworthy antibiotics for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. The purpose of this study, was to determine the phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide resistance, among S. aureus, isolated from clinical samples and nasal swabs.
    Materials And Methods
    Totally, 162 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from clinical samples and nasal swabs, from patients and healthcare workers (HCWs), between March 2016 and September 2016, at four teaching hospitals in Isfahan. The antibiotic resistance profile was determined using disk diffusion test and the presence of resistance genes was detected, using PCR.
    Results
    Of 162 S. aureus isolates, 43.8% (71/162) and 34% (55/162) isolates were erythromycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), respectively. The prevalence of constitutive MLSB (cMLSB), inducible MLSB (iMLSB), macrolide-streptogramin B-resistant (MSB) and lincosamide-streptogramin-A resistance (LSA) phenotype was 32%, 6%, 6% and 2%, respectively. The most common erythromycin resistance genes, in S. aureus isolates were ermC (35.2%), followed by ermA (20.4%) and msrA (17.3%). Meanwhile, msrA was detected in 43.6% of MRSA isolates. The frequency of coexistence of ermA窹苺欫, in S. aureus isolates was 7% and it was only detected in MRSA isolates.
    Conclusion
    In the current study, cMLSB phenotype was the most common erythromycin resistance pattern and ermC was the most prevalent gene in erythromycin-resistant isolates. The results revealed that the various mechanisms of erythromycin resistance are expanding in Isfahan.
    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Inducible resistance, D-test, erm A, ermC, msrA}
  • Fahimeh Ghanbari, Hasan Ghajavand, Roholla Havaei, Mohammad‑Saeid Jami, Farzad Khademi, Leila Heydari, Mojtaba Shahin, Seyed Asghar Havaei*
    Background

    The rising frequency of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has led to an increased use of antibiotics such as macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin B (MLSB ) for the treatment of S. aureus infections. Resistance to MLSB in S. aureus is commonly encoded by erm genes, which can be constitutive MLSB (cMLSB ) or inducible MLSB (iMLSB ). The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of cMLSB , iMLSB , and MS phenotypes using D‑test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods.

    Materials and Methods

    A total of 215 isolates of S. aureus were collected from January 2010 to May 2012 from Al‑Zahra Hospital in Isfahan. PCR was performed for detection of mecA gene on all isolates using specific primers. The frequency of MLSB ‑resistant isolates was determined using D‑test, and then a multiplex PCR was performed for detection of ermA, ermB, and ermC genes.

    Results

    Among 215 S. aureus isolates examined, 82 (40.9%) were MRSA, and iMLSB , cMLSB , and MS resistance phenotypes had a frequency of 9 (4.18%), 58 (26.9%), and 11 (5.1%), respectively. Among nine isolates with iMLSB resistance phenotype, four isolates contained ermC gene, two isolates ermB gene, and one isolate ermA gene. Two isolates did not have any erm gene.

    Conclusion

    In the current study, cMLSB was the most frequent phenotype and ermC was the most common gene in iMLSB resistant phenotypes.

    Keywords: Clindamycin, D‑test, erm genes, inducible resistance, Staphylococcus aureus}
  • Abdolmajid Ghasemian, Shahin Najar Peerayeh, Bita Bakhshi, Mohsen Mirzaee
    Background
    Clindamycin inducible resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S.aureus) isolates can cause failure in treatment with this antibiotic. Biofilm production via polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA) contributes in the colonization of S. aureus, resulting in the initiation of different diseases. The aim of this study was to detect icaADBC genes among isolates of S.aureus with inducible resistance to clindamycin.
    Materials And Methods
    A total of 209 clinical S.aureus isolates werecollected and identified by conventional phenotypic tests. Isolates with inducible resistance to clindamycin were detected by double disk diffusion test (D-Test) using clindamycin (2 μg) and erythromycin (15 μg). Oxacillin was used to detect Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was performed to detect the icaADBC genes.
    Results
    The rate of clindamycin inducible resistance was 4% (n=8). All the isolates were susceptible to methicillin. Four isolates (50%) contained the whole icaADBC genes. The prevalence of icaA, icaB, icaC and icaD genes were 5 (62.5%), 4 (50%), 6 (75%) and 5 (62.5%), respectively.
    Conclusion
    The results indicate that the prevalence of icaADBC genes among clindamycin inducible resistant strains was low, and also these strains were susceptible to methicillin.
    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, inducible resistance, D, test, MRSA, icaADBC operon}
  • صفیه عباسی *، بهنام زمانزاد، ابوالفضل قلی پور، محمد صادق دماوندی
    مقدمه
    مقاومت به کلیندامایسین در استافیلوکوکها به دو صورت بنیادی و القایی ایجاد می شود. درسویه هایی از این باکتری ها که به اریترومایسین مقاوم هستند، ممکن است مقاومت القایی به کلیندامایسین نیز رخ دهد که با روش های معمول آنتی بیوگرام قابل تشخیص نیست. این مطالعه با هدف تعیین فنوتیپ های القایی مقاوم به کلیندامایسین در سویه های استافیلوکوک جدا شده ازبیماران بستری در بیمارستان های هاجر و کاشانی شهرکرد انجام شد.
    روش بررسی
    این مطالعه توصیفی –تحلیلی برروی 200 ایزوله استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس و استافیلوکوک کواگولاز منفی مقاوم به متی سیلین که ازنمونه های بالینی بیماران جدا شده بودند با استفاده ازروش دیسک دیفیوژن انجام گرفت. مقاومت به کلیندامایسین درایزوله ها یی که به اریترومایسین مقاوم بودند، با ظهورهاله حساسیت به شکل D مشخص گردید.
    یافته ها
    از بین 200 ایزوله استافیلوکوک مقاوم به متی سیلین، فنوتیپ D در 6 ایزوله (3%) (یک ایزوله استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس و 5 ایزوله استافیلوکوک کواگولاز منفی) مشاهده شد. در چهار ایزوله فنوتیپ مثبت Dمشاهده شد. 13 ایزوله نیز فنوتیپ D منفی رانشان دادند.
    نتیجه گیری
    تست تعیین مقاومتهای القایی روش مناسبی برای شناسایی الگوهای مقاومت در بین سویه های مختلف استافیلوکوک می باشد. به نظر می رسد انجام تست D درسویه های با فنوتیپ مقاوم به اریترومایسین ضروری بوده، وبا انجام این آزمایش می توان گزارش صحیح تری از حساسیت واقعی این سویه ها نسبت به کلیندامایسین ارائه داد.
    کلید واژگان: تست القاء, کلیندامایسین, اریترومایسین, استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس, استافیلوکوکوس های کوآگولازمنفی}
    Abbasi S., Zamanzad B.*, Gholipour A., Damavandi
    Background And Aims
    Clindamycin resistance in staphylococci is appeared in constitutive and inducible forms. Resistance to clindamycin in erythromycin resistant strains of these bacteria occasionally occurs that they cannot be detected by antibiogram routine procedures. This study was aimed to detect resistant inducible phenotypes to clindamycin in staphylococcal strains isolated from patients hospitalized in Shahrekord Hajar and Kashani hospitals.
    Methods
    This descriptive-analytical study was performed on 200 strains of staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci to methicillin. They were isolated from hospital clinical samples of patients hospitalized in Hajar and Kashani hospitals using disk diffusion method. Clindamycin resistance in erythromycin resistant strains was detected by developing a D- shape zone of sensitivity.
    Results
    Phenotype D from 200 isolates of methicillin-resistant staphylococci was detected in 6 isolates (3%) (1 staphylococcus aureus and 5 coagulase negative staphylococci isolates). Phenotype +D were observed in four isolates. 13 isolates had negative phenotype D.
    Conclusions
    Inducible resistance test in staphylococcal strains is a suitable method for reorganization of the antibiotic resistance in these bacteria. It seems the performance of test D is necessary in erythromycin resistant strains. Implementing this test can present a better correct report about real sensitivities than these strains to clindamycin.
    Keywords: Clindamycin, Constitutive resistance, Erythromycin, Staphylococcus, Inducible resistance}
  • Inducible clindamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmadreza Zarifian
    Background And Objectives
    Staphylococcusaureus is a prominent human pathogen. One of the drugs used in the treatment of staphylococcal infections (particularly infections of skin and soft tissue), is clindamycin. Resistance to clindamycin includes two types: inducible and constitutive. Routine laboratory methods of antibiotic susceptibility testing cannot detect the inducible type and D-test is required for its detection. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the relative prevalence of this type of resistance in Iran.
    Methods
    Search terms «inducible clindamycin resistant», «D-test», «Staphylococcus aureus» and «Iran» were used to find relevant articles in PubMed, Google Scholar and two Persian search engines. Also, the abstracts of the recent national microbiology congresses were checked. All studies used D-test to find iMLSB (inducible macrolide, lincosamide and streptograminB resistance) phenotype among clinical isolates (not nasal swabs) of S. aureus, were included. In order to perform meta-analysis, we used “comprehensive meta-analysis” software (ver. 2).
    Results
    In total, 9 articles and 8 abstracts related to the topic of the study were found. Random effects meta-analyses showed a pooled estimate for percentage of iMLSB phenotype among 2683 samples of S. aureus was about 10% (95% confidence interval: 0. 07-0. 12). Using the fixed effect model, the odds of positive iMLSB in methicillin-resistant S. aureus was about 5 times more likely to occur in comparison with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (95% CI: 3. 49 to 7. 76).
    Conclusion
    Fortunately, the relative frequency of inducibleresistance to clindamycin in our country is relatively low. However, we believe that D-test should be performed for all erythromicin-resistant isolates in order to identify inducible resistance to clindamycin. Moreover, reevaluation of inducible resistance to clindamycin in forthcoming years is highly recommended.
    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, inducible resistance, clindamycin, Iran, systematic review}
  • غلامرضا گودرزی، مژگان آزادپور*
    زمینه و هدف
    تست D، با قرار دادن دیسک های حاوی کلیندامایسین و اریترومایسین در یک فاصله استاندارد بر روی پلیت آگار و مشاهده هاله عدم رشد پهن شده در اطراف دیسک کلیندامایسین انجام می گیرد. یک تست D مثبت، بر مقاومت القایی نسبت به کلیندامایسین دلالت داشته و همچنین، احتمال شکست درمانی این آنتی بیوتیک در بالین را پیشگویی می کند. هدف از این مطالعه، تعیین فراوانی مقاومت القایی استافیلوکوکی نسبت به کلیندامایسین با استفاده از تست D بود.
    مواد و روش ها
    در این مطالعه توصیفی- مقطعی، مقاومت القایی نسبت به کلیندامایسین، بر روی 150 ایزوله استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس (103=n) و استافیلوکوکوس کواگولاز منفی (47=n) جمع آوری شده از بینی کارکنان و نمونه های بالینی با استفاده از تست D ارزیابی شد. داده ها با استفاده از آزمون کای اسکوئر مورد ارزیابی آماری قرار گرفتند.
    یافته ها
    از 103 ایزوله استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس، 22 (4/21%) ایزوله مقاوم به متی سیلین بودند. در بین ایزوله های مورد آزمایش، 3 (2%)، 1 (6/0%) و 2 (3/1%) ایزوله به ترتیب فنوتیپ D، D+ و HD داشتند و 54 (36%) ایزوله، به هر دو آنتی بیوتیک اریترومایسین و کلیندامایسین مقاومت نشان دادند. فراوانی مقاومت به کلیندامایسین و اریترومایسین بین ایزوله های مقاوم به متی سیلین و حساس به متی سیلین از نظر آماری معنادار بود (05/0p<).
    نتیجه گیری
    مقاومت فنوتیپی به اریترومایسین در همه موارد قابل تعمیم به کلیندامایسین نیست. بنابراین، ایزوله های استافیلوکوکوس مقاوم به اریترومایسین و حساس به کلیندامایسین باید با تست D مورد ارزیابی قرار گیرند.
    کلید واژگان: مقاومت القایی, کلیندامایسین, استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس, تست D}
    Gh.R. Goudarzi, M. Azadpour *
    Background And Objective
    The D-test is performed by placing clindamycin and erythromycin impregnated disks at a standard distance on the agar plate then looking for the flattening of inhibition zone around the clindamycin disk. A positive D-test indicates clindamycin inducible resistance and also predicts treatment failure possibility of this antibiotic in clinic. Prevalence of staphylococcal inducible resistance to clindamycin through the D-test was the aim of this study.
    Materials And Methods
    In this descriptive-cross-sectional study، inducible resistance to clindamycin was examined on the 150 isolated Staphylococcus aureus (n=103) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=47) collected from nasal employees and clinical samples by using D-test. The statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test.
    Results
    Out of 103 isolated S. aureus، 22 (21. 4%) were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Among the tested samples، 3 (2%)، 1 (0. 6%) and 2 (1. 3%) had D، D+ and HD phenotypes، respectively. Fifty-four (36%) of isolations exhibited resistance to both clindamycin and erythromycin. Prevalence of resistance to clindamycin and erythromycin between isolated MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) was statistically significant (p<0. 05).
    Conclusion
    Phenotypical resistance to erythromycin is not always attributable to clindamycin resistance. Therefore، staphylococcus strains resistant to erythromycin and susceptible to clindamycin should be subjected to D-test assay.
    Keywords: Inducible resistance, Clindamycin, Staphylococcus aureus, D, test}
  • Homa Frouhesh, Tehrani, Asghar Ashrafi, Hafez, Zohreh Sharifi, Hossein Farahzadi
    Background
    Streptococcus group B (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae is typically associated with neonatal disease and infection in pregnant women. Mortality of GBS sepsis in neonates is over 50% and is particularly high in preterm infants. GBS also causes invasive infection in pregnant and non-pregnant women including urinary tract infection (UTI). Penicillin-derived antibiotics remained as choice drugs for treatment of GBS infection; however, Erythromycin and Clindamycin are useful in cases of allergic to Penicillin. The aim of this study was to investigate the resistance to Erythromycin and Clindamycin, especially inducible Clindamycin resistance, in GBS isolated from urinary samples of women who attended medical offices in Tehran, Iran.
    Materials And Methods
    This study was conducted on 5000 urine samples from Jan. 2011 to Oct. 2012 that 104 GBS were isolated. The isolates were identified as GBS using laboratory criteria. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was done by Erythromycin disk 15µg and Clindamycin disk 2µg for observation inducible resistant D-zone test by double-disk diffusion method with Erythromycin and adjacent Clindamycin.
    Results
    Among the 5000 urine samples 104 (2.08%) were Beta hemolytic GBS. Of the 104 isolated GBS, 22 (21.2%) were resistance, 24 (23%) were intermediate, and 58 (55.8%) were susceptible to Erythromycin; however, 24 (23%) were resistance, 5 (4.8%) were intermediate, and 75 (72.2%) were susceptible to Clindamycin. Of the 22 Erythromycin-resistant isolates, 10 (9.5% in total GBS isolated) displayed the D zone; it means they have inducible Erythromycin resistant to Clindamycin.
    Conclusion
    Various studies in other countries report lower rates of inducible Clindamycin resistance; it indicates the use of more macrolides in the treatment of UTI.
    Keywords: Streptococcus Group B, Inducible Resistance, Erythromycin, Clindamycin, Resistance, UTI}
  • Shahla Mansouri, Javid Sadeghi *
    Background
    Clindamycin is a frequently used antimicrobial therapeutic medicine used for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus strains. Resistance to this antibiotic is either constitutive or inducible. Constitutive resistance to clindamycin could be detected by standard susceptibility testing methods. Inducible clindamycin resistance could not be detected by in vitro routine tests. This type of resistance can be identified by D-test..
    Objectives
    The outbreak of inducible resistance to clindamycin in methicillin resistant and-susceptible S. aureus isolates were investigated in this study..
    Materials And Methods
    Totally 162 S. aureus isolates were evaluated for inducible clindamycin resistance by D-test in accordance with clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) guidelines..
    Results
    Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected in 8.64% of S. aureus isolates. Inducible and constitutive resistance to clindamycin was found to be higher in methicillin resistant S. aureus (11.95% and 47.8% respectively) compared to methicillin susceptible S. aureus (4.28% and 2.85% respectively) isolates..
    Conclusions
    Our results showed that inducible resistance to clindamycin in S. aureus isolates is relatively higher in this region. Therefore, D-test should be performed to prevent treatment failures against infections caused by S. aureus, which are resistant to erythromycin and the sensitive ones against clindamycin..
    Keywords: Clindamycin, Staphylococcus aureus, D, test, Inducible Resistance}
  • Najmeh Seifi, Nadia Kahani, Emran Askari, Somayeh Mahdipour, Mahboubeh Naderi Nasab
    Background And Objectives
    Staphylococcus aureus is an important agent in hospital and community-associated infections, causing high morbidity and mortality. Introduction of the new antimicrobial classes for this pathogen is usually followed by the emergence of resistant strains through multiple mechanisms. For instance, resistance to clindamycin (CLI), can be constitutive or inducible. Inducible clindamycin resistance which may lead to treatment failure can simply be identified by performing D-test. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates by D-test method.
    Materials And Methods
    This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 254 non-duplicated S. aureus isolates in Imam Reza hospital of Mashhad during 2010. Susceptibility to oxacillin, cefoxitin, erythromycin and clindamycin was performed by disk agar diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines and D-shaped clindamycin susceptibility patterns where considered as D-test positive (D+).
    Results
    Of 211 S. aureus isolates 88 (37.82%) were methicillin resistant. It was found that of 88 MRSA isolates, 78 (88.63%) were erythromycin (ERY) resistant and 46 (52.27%) were CLI resistant. ERY and CLI resistance in MSSA strains was 21.95% and 11.96% respectively. Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected in 18 (20.45%) MRSA isolates. 47(53.40%) of MRSA isolates and 9 (7.32%) of MSSA showed constitutive MLSB phenotype.
    Conclusion
    In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance phenotype in our region. We recommend that whenever clindamycin is intended for S. aureus infections, D-test should be performed to facilitate the optimal treatment of patients.
    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, clindamycin, Inducible resistance}
  • Shoja S., Nahaei M.R.*, Nahaei M
    Objectives
    Clindamycin is frequently used for treatment of staphylococcal infections, particulary in skin and soft tissue infections. Resistance to this antibiotic may be constitutive or inducible. Although constitutive resistance to clidamycin can be detectd by standard susceptibility testing methods, inducible clindamycin resistance is not detected by standard broth- or agar based susceptibility test methods. This type of resistance can be detected by a simple double disc diffusion test. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
    Methods
    For detection of inducible clindamycin resistance and to estimate the rate of resistance, 100 clinical isolates of each Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were tested with disc diffusion method by using of erythromycin (15μg) and clindamycin (2μg) discs according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidline.
    Results
    Five isolates of Staphylococcus aureus revealed inducible resistance and recorded as D phenotype and one isolate was D+, while only one isolate of Staphylococcus epidermidis was detected as D phenotype.
    Conclusion
    Our results revealed that inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (%6) is higher than Staphylococcus epidermidis (%1). Since isolates with inducible resistance may mutate and change to constitutive resistance, can lead to treatment failure. Therefore it is necessary to examine the inducible resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains which are resistant to erythromycin and sensitive to clindamycin.
    Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, D, test Clindamycin, Inducible Resistance}
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال