جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « criteria decision » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

Decisions in health promotion are multidimensional. It means that there are multi criteria situations in decision-making for health promotion. Regarding the importance of designing ast selecting appropriate alternatives, some Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods for health promotion have been introduced ast explained in this article. Articles published in some reliable data bases such as Web of Sciences, Medline, Ebsco, Science Direct, Google scholar as well as some Persian articles ast dissertations specially in health education ast health promotion fields were reviewed. Reviewing health education ast health promotions articles ast dissertations published in Iran isticated that some decision-making techniques such as Delfi method, Brain Storming ast Nominal Groups ast some other approaches have been applied, but methods with mathematical, theoretical, ast reliable predictive power backgrousts have been ignored. Applying Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods that typically consider different factors simultaneously with economic assessment are necessary for health education ast health promotion interventions.

Iodine is one of the most important pollutants in nuclear installations and various absorbents have been proposed to remove it. The purpose of this study was to select the optimal airborne iodine absorbents according to the conditions in Iran. To implement the optimization model, at first, eight criteria were selected and their weights were determined using the SMART and Eigenevector methods. Then these weights were converted to one weight by the geometric mean. Finally, the indexes were prioritized using the two optimization methods of SAW and TOPSIS. Maximum weight of the criteria was related to the cost of providing the raw material and minimum to the storage time. Based on priority, the activated charcoal should be used as an optimum absorbent. TOPSIS and SAW methods were used to prioritize different absorbent beds; the results were equal in both methods. Furthermore, the results indicated that conventional activated charcoal, activated charcoal impregnated with TEDA, activated charcoal impregnated with HMTA and silver Zeolites are respectively the best absorbents in Iran. Although the activated charcoal impregnated with TEDA has the most optimum rate of absorption, considering the influence of other parameters on its selection, this absorbent assigns a secondary priority. By eliminating technological bottlenecks in industrial production of activated carbon impregnated with TEDA, the individual and collective protection systems will be upgraded.