جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « violation » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

Background and Goals:

 Hygiene and body health for body maintenance is one of the natural and innate needs of humans and one of the goals of religion, and among the five essentials in jurisprudence. And using the treatment methods is emphasized for realizing this goal in religious doctrines. Cupping is one of the traditional treatment methods that help in the recovery or relief of body pains by streaming the blood (dry cupping) or taking out the blood through surface punctures in the skin (wet cupping). As blood is unclean in Islamic jurisprudence, one of the disagreements among jurists is the impact of taking out the blood on the rules of purity, fasting, and hajj. And the induction and assessment of the pros and cons reasons in this regard may prepare the background for preferring the right view.

 The current research is performed with a descriptive-analytical method of the content analysis type and aims at a comparative study of jurisprudence texts of the Islamic religions to investigate the impact of cupping on the devotional issues including purity (dipping and ablution), fasting, and ihram.

 After concluding the jurists' views and the pros and cons reasons, it seems that cupping does not cause a dipping and does not violate the ablution, and does not revoke fasting. As there are disagreements on the permission of cupping for the pilgrims, it seems that there are no barriers for pilgrims to undergo cupping especially when there is a necessity; but paying the ransom is obligatory.

What is examined in this article is the basics and principles ofjudging violations and dealing with disciplinary violations byjudges, as well as the behavioral field of health system workers(medical professionals and related). The reasons formisconduct in the field of judges' behavior and theresponsibility of doctors and related professions are analyzedbased on the ideological foundations and social developmentsof their justification and the bases of criminal prosecutionaccording to the principles of criminalization. It is stable andevery criminal policy is required to comply with it with all thecredit that the law gives to the judge and to secure his jobposition, but in any case, if the judge commits a judicialviolation and the doctors do not comply with the ethical andlegal principles related to the medical profession, thecompetence He has lost the necessary legal rights for this job,and competent authorities must deal with this matter and, ifproven, stop him from continuing his work or face disciplinarypunishments. he does; Such as the principle of independenceof the judge, the principle of immunity, transparency and theprinciple of non-infringement of the privacy of judges. Theprinciples of fair proceedings also rule regarding the treatmentof doctors' violations. What is important is the manner of thisresponse and how to apply the regulations related to it throughthe investigation authorities. And dealing with disciplinaryviolations should not be an excuse to distort these principles