Different Types of Contrast in Persian Language

The contrast of semantic links between words and its important compound of language which in aspect of words studies it’s placed in grammatical part and within meaning its part of Rhetoric issues. Speakers are utilizing these components in their language subconsciously. Because the conflict in the Persian language is completely modular so in many cases is auricular. In some modular structure, in addition to the type of structure, the user, it should also make sense to semantic. The style of relationship companion of the most important factor is in determining the contrast. As opposed to two in all features other than a word that refers to the same specification. the conflict word refers to negative words. The style of relationship companion of the most important factor is in determining the contrast. When it opposite should apply to all non-identical and identical features of two words.Conflict in the Persian language has two main structures: inductive or antonyms derived from a combination of different prefixes with nouns, adjectives, verbs and roots. because there are no conflicting instrument in Persian languages. The second sonic antonyms or compound that when the main focus on the meaning of a word is a constant and a variable component to another. Sometimes contradictory combinations with “vave atf” or without is made. If it this contradictory combinations consists of a single concept of antonyms bring to mind in the paradoxical or contradictory view of is used rhetoric in grammatical books rarely pointed to category of conflict. Scholars typically have not paid to the conflict. In a field study was nearly studied sixty books. A total of them were more than 20-thousand-pages. Less than seven pages of these books was on contrast.