The Nature of Diyat in Islam vs. Punitive Damages in the US: A comparative Study
Author(s):
Abstract:
Today it has proven essential to make a distinction between “crime and punishment” and “civil faults”، and the consent of responsibility must be categorized in either of the above two classes; hence، their effects must be a function of their general effects. It follows that with introduction of the institution of Diyat in the Iranian legal system، queries raise as how to classify and place if in the category of legal or civil institutions. Despite two other rival theories، a theory that regards admixture Diyatof the elements of both of the above classes، tries to justify all of its elements and effects. To justify benefiting a legal institution of a dual nature، proponents of this theory make reference to the punitive damages in the US legal system; the present paper endorses the possibility of a legal institution enjoying a dual nature and focuses on the rate of similarities and differences of Diyat and punitive damages.
Keywords:
Diyat , Punitive damages , Compensation , Punishment , Zeman
Language:
Persian
Published:
Comparative Law Researches, Volume:17 Issue: 2, 2014
Pages:
118 to 143
https://magiran.com/p1249344
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!