Judicabilty of the Right to Social Security: A Comparative Study in Iranian and English Law, in the Light of International Human Rights Instruments

The shift from "identify the right" to the "rights enforcement", About concepts related to human rights in the twentieth century it reached its full. Social security rights of the categories that have been in the process, has played a mportant role. Social Security is a fundamental human right. So in this respect for the rights of individuals, need mechanisms to be predicted. This research focus on the concept of the social security right and And that social security, are both human rights and part of the civil rights, in the light of international human rights instruments such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the Court of Human Rights in Europe have important contributions to the Human Rights evolution and grant these rights are guaranteed and pays the right to social security hearing ability. The results of this comparative study, the right to social security in the UK shows that the right to social trial in the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been the failure such as there is not specific forums to address claims that is social security.For this reason Insured persons in social organization and other organizations and funds about competent authority to deal with complaints in the insurance and protection are confused and Today many countries have witnessed a change in the nature of the right to social assistance, a reflection of a right or legitimate claim to a personal right or legal right. Social assistance is not considered legal in our country. Article 29 of the constitution, which, like other human rights instruments “Benefit from social security" as "the right of everyone" knows, largely not realized it needs serious review of laws and regulations related to it.