Interference of causes and inducements in Jurisprudence and statute
Multiplicity of provision and unity of result and its outcome which is interference or non-interference of causes and inducements was studied in Jurisprudence and statute in this article. The purpose of this article was removal of conflict in provisional sentences in which there is multiplicity of provision and unity of result and determination of dictum of those provisional sentences from the viewpoint of interference or noninterference of causes and inducements. The outcome was that for removal of conflict in these provisional sentences it should be taken into account that causes and inducements wouldn’t basically interfere, whether the result is repeatable or not, unless there would be a reason for interference. As a rule in statutes, it should be said that in various cases when provision is multiple and result is the same, every provision, without relying on others, causes the result to come into being, unless its contrary is proven.
-
A Critical Analysis to Note Two of Articles 14 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1392 SH: Compatibility of Blood Money and Civil Damages
Abbas Karimi *, Hassan Badini, MohammadHadi Javaherkalam
journal of Private law studies, -
A new look at the concept, basis and effect for “ZAMAN DARAK” in Imamiyya jurisprudence and civil law
Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law,