Criticism of Religious Science Denial

The topic of religious science is a challangable issue, which attracts manyproponents and opponents. Religious science denial would be based onmany bases such as semantic fundamentals, the study of science (absolutescience, natural sciences and humanities), and the study of religion which thearticle is to criticize and investigate. From the semantic aspect, somemeanings of religius science are acceptable and some other are denied;although the accpetance has not much outcome and the denial has no logicalsupport. Some important fundamentals of the study of science aremethodoligical inclusivism, segrigation between the stage of compilationand the stage of judgment and the lack of leaking religious presuppositionsto judgment stage, which will be criticized. Considering minimal scope forthe realm of religion is none of the fundamental in the study of religion thatrefer to the lack of capacity and power of religion to extract the scientificpropositions from religious sources. Criticizing this fundamenal principleand explaining the maximum attitude, it is considered that different aspectsof sciences and humanistic knowledge can enjoy religious sources.