A comparison of continuous and discrete indices in measuring Gorgan forest landscape fragmentation
Author(s):
Abstract:
Landscape ecology is mainly based on the patch-corridor-matrix model. Although this model is efficient and has been successfully used in landscape ecology studies, but it is believed that this model cannot consider the continuous heterogeneity. This fact has encouraged researchers in the field to find new indicators for landscape analysis in a continuous framework. The aim of this study is a comparison of continuous and discrete indices in measuring Gorgan forest landscape fragmentation based on the moving window technique. This technique was performed on a classified map derived from SPOT satellite image in year 2010 using a maximum likelihood algorithm and on NDVI vegetation index from a Landsat satellite image of the year 2010. Window sizes were considered in 60, 90, 150 and 300 meters and six landscape class-level metrics were selected for the comparison including LPI, LSI, SPLIT, MESH, AI and PLAND. To assess the correlation between the output images of each of these metrics, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used. The results of the statistical comparisons of different window sizes showed that the values of the correlation coefficient were increased with increasing window size, as the high correlation values were seen when the window size was 300m belonging to PLAND and SPLIT metrics. All of the metrics had minimum correlation values in the window size 60m and the LSI metric had the lowest correlation (0.33).
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Journal of Rs and Gis for natural Resources, Volume:7 Issue: 3, 2016
Pages:
30 to 45
https://magiran.com/p1617348
مقالات دیگری از این نویسنده (گان)
-
Assessment and Prioritization of Urban Development Sustainability Using a Hybrid Approach: Group Fuzzy BWM and GIS
Farzaneh Forouzesh, Seyed Massoud Monavari *, Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny, Mmaryam Robati, Razieh Rahimi
Environmental Researches, -
The Analysis of Scenario Planning in Foresight and Frameworks of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Futures Studies
Elham Sedighi *, Abdolrassoul Salmanmahini, Hassan Daliri, Brian D. Fath, Seyed Hamed Mirkarimi
Journal of Strategic Management and Futures Studies,