Documentary and textual analysis of Narrations that water that is heated by the sun

By the pass of time, some hadiths have suffered damages including: paraphrasing without observing its qualifications, alteration and inaccurate application of the hadith to the verses of Quran. These defects are considered obstacles to proper understanding of the hadith and its acceptance without further inquiries. It is therefore necessary to examine the authority and source of a hadith prior to it is acceptance or rejection, and prior to its interpretation , given it is accepted.
The hadith known as that of mosquito (ba’uza) is among those claimed as forged. It is published on the authority of Imam Sadegh (PBUH) and narrated in the Qomi Exegesis claiming that the mosquito mentioned in the verse 26th of the Sura al-Baqara refers to Imam Ali. There is also a hadith in the exegesis attributed to Imam Askari(PBUH) which some consider as an evidence to the falseness of the mentioned hadith. Contrary to the cited view, others try to find a justification to reconcile the two hadith.
Examining the isnad and the text of the mosquito hadith and technically evaluating it by gathering other hadiths on the issue, this article has considered both the possibility of reconciliation or preference of each hadith. Eventually it became clear that the hadith was damaged due to improper paraphrasing which made ground for misunderstanding, alteration in the text and use of deceitful methods (tadlis)in the isnad can also be traced back in this hadith. It is also concluded that denoting mosquito to Imam Ali(PBUH) in the 26th verse of the second sura ,as the exoteric meaning of the verse is not correct , the correct hadith of it being available.