Assessment and Zoning of the Areas Fit for Tourism of Isfahan Province Using GIS

Abstract:
Introduction
According to Universal World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), cultural tourism refers to "the travelling of the human beings with merely cultural motivations such as academic, artistic and learning tours as well as their journeys for academic purposes, taking part in the festivals and other cultural events, visit to the sites and places, travel with an academic nature, folklore or art and pilgrimage…" Technically, cultural tourism includes the travelling of the human beings for the purpose of visiting the specific cultural attractions such as cultural heritage sites, cultural aesthetic symbols, arts and parades events which are situated outside of their ordinary living place.
Nature-based tourism refers to a form of tourism which depends mainly on the relatively undeveloped natural environments for their attractions (Wurzinger and Johanson, 2006). It is mainly related to the direct enjoyment of the intact and unchanged phenomenon of the nature (Valentine, 1992).
Nature-based tourism can play a positive role in the development of the local target community local economy and bring huge benefits for the host economies (Hill et al, 2006). The economic benefits resulting from nature-based tourism include: the creation of local employment opportunities, the tourism revenues, the infrastructure improvement and foreign exchange (Lai and Nepal, 2006). Nature-based tourism has been recognized as the factor linking the wildlife protection and economic development. As some authors argue, the nature-based tourism perpetuates the efficient use of all resources perpetual providing some incentives for conserving the intact natural systems especially in developing countries (Kiss, 2004). The benefits of nature-based tourism depends on the substitution of the productive activities in order to reduce the pressure placed on the resources through providing a reliable and sustainable resource (Wunder, 2000).
Research
Methodology
The present study intends to determine the prioritized areas apt for tourism in Isfahan province, Iran. Considering the components under research, this study is applied-developmental in nature with its methodology being descriptive-survey based on systematic analysis. To carry out the assessment, scoring the areas has been done based on three variables, namely the number of attractions, the level of performance (national, local and international) and level of access (pedestrian or vehicle access) to the cultural-historical attraction sites) and the natural attractions and the human-made.
Discussion and
Results
Based on the given scores, the highest capacity for the historical-cultural tourism of Isfahan city is centrally situated in two areas i.e. the center area with the centrality of Isfahan city and North-East area with the centrality of Kashan city and then, Natanz. Since this centrality has been determined based on the number of attractions, the level of performance and the access to the attractions, it includes a radius of 40 km from the center of Isfahan and Kashan cities, as well. Accordingly, Qohi village and Isfahan city in Isfahan town, Mashhad Ardahal, Joshaqan, Esterk, Taher Abad, Azvar, Rahq, Van, Joinan, Ravanad, qahroud villages, Natanze, Badroud cities, Abianeh and Ab senjed villages in Natanze town are located in these two areas.
Aran o Bidgol , Noush Abad cities and Yazdel and Ali Abad villages in Aran o Bidgol town, Zavareh, Ardestan cities and Moqar village in Ardestan town, Naein city in Naein town , Kolhar, Se, Mourchekhort villages and Gaz and Borkhar city in Shahinshar town and Meimeh enjoy the highest scores as the decentralized areas.
Based on the ratings, Isfahan province has been classified into 5 categories and the highest scores were found to be belonged to Semirom, Fereydunshahr, Freydan, Khansar, Chadegan and Dehaghan towns spread on the WestSouth and West as two concentrated points. The WesternSouth area includes Semirom Town especially Dangezlu, Noghl, Khefer, Sivar, Mandegan, Sarbaz Kifteh Guisin, Ghaleh Sangi, Roud Abad, Bibi Seidan, Ab Malakh, Ghabr Kikha, Garamuk, Agh Dash, Kezen, Cheshmeh Sard, Shams Abad villages and Semirom, Vanak and Kameh cities. The Western domain includes Fereydunshahr town and a number of its villages including Khosh Mive, Chaghirut, Sibak, Meidanak Bozorg, Surashjan, Ghahshejan, Pashandegan, Gurab Milajerd and Fereydunshahr city, the Fereydan town and Noghan Olia, its village, Ofus, Buein and Mianadasht, Daran and Damaneh, Khansar town and a number of its villages including Tidjan, Ghudjan and Hasan Abad and Lahijan as well as Khansar city.
Based on the given scores, the highest capacity for human-made tourism is two areas Isfahan city and Mobarake.
Conclusion
Based on the findings of the study, there is a potential milieu for the nature-based tourism development in Isfahan Province and thus its towns and urban and rural areas. The research on the capacity analysis of Isfahan province in terms of cultural- historical tourism development shows that based on the given scores, nearly %29.51 and %19.6 of the total attractions of the province and %34.7and %22.55 of the cultural- historical tourism attractions of the region respectively belong to Isfahan and Kashan towns. In more detail, %76.49of the historical-cultural attractions of Isfahan province belong to Isfahan while the scores obtained for its different regions are as follows: %50 for region 3, %19.82 for region 1, %13.36 for region 6, %10.91for region 5.
The research on the capacity-analysis of Isfahan Province regarding natural tourism development show that based on the assigned scores, Isfahan Province is divided into four categories with the highest scores being for Semirom, Chadegan, Fereydunshahr and Freydan towns so that they can be considered as the areas appropriate for nature-based tourism development. To explain more, based on the given scores, %92.06 and %68.18 of the tourism capacity of these two cities belong to the nature-based tourism. Hence, it has the highest frequency and a good situation across the province area in this regard. On the other hand, although Semirom and Fereydunxhahr towns both account for only %14.38 of the province area, they possess %15.18 and %11.78 of the nature-based tourism attractions in this region.
Language:
Persian
Published:
Human Geography Research Quarterly, Volume:49 Issue: 99, 2017
Pages:
81 to 94
https://www.magiran.com/p1671543  
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با ثبت ایمیلتان و پرداخت حق اشتراک سالانه به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال، بلافاصله متن این مقاله را دریافت کنید.اعتبار دانلود 70 مقاله نیز در حساب کاربری شما لحاظ خواهد شد.

پرداخت حق اشتراک به معنای پذیرش "شرایط خدمات" پایگاه مگیران از سوی شماست.

اگر مقاله ای از شما در مگیران نمایه شده، برای استفاده از اعتبار اهدایی سامانه نویسندگان با ایمیل منتشرشده ثبت نام کنید. ثبت نام

اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
  • حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران می‌شود.
  • پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانه‌های چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمی‌دهد.
In order to view content subscription is required

Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!