The Basics and Legal Status of Compensation for Unjustified Detention in Iranian Criminal Procedure
Author(s):
Abstract:
According to a general rule, the Prosecutor's Office is deemed irresponsible for the defendants who after the prosecution, are exonerated due to order for suspension of prosecution or acquittal. Such a rule is included in order to maintain common good in criminal proceedings. In fact, the public interest, that is, the necessity to pursue vigorously all the defendants in order to find the truth, does not tolerate the excessive caution of prosecutor institution. However, when in the prosecution process and in accordance with the order of detention or orders leading to arrest the innocent defendant is deprived of liberty, non-responsibility is not fair. This is why the legislators of different countries anticipated compensation for damages caused by unjustified arrests and consider the government responsible of the days of arrest of an accused innocent. In Iran, before the adoption of the Code of Criminal Procedure 2013 (1392), there was no provision in this regard, and the only general rule was the current legal mistake rule. In the new law, the legislator with forecast of articles 256 - 259 adopted a realistic standpoint toward justice by predicting compensation for unjustified arrests
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
A Biannual Journal Criminal Law Research, Volume:8 Issue: 1, 2017
Pages:
37 to 58
https://magiran.com/p1709541
سامانه نویسندگان
مقالات دیگری از این نویسنده (گان)
-
Differential Protection of Vulnerable Accused in Criminal Proceedings (Looking at EU Laws)
*
A Biannual Journal Criminal Law Research, -
The Role of the Victim in Adultery with Seduction and Deception from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Law in the Light of Scientific Victimology
Hamidreza Shamlou, Mohsen Rahami *, Elham Heydari, Karim Salehi
Journal of Comparative Criminal Jurisprudence,