A Reflection on the Effect of Theological Political Disputes on the Political Campaigns (with the Emphasis on the Era of the Development of Iran Islamic Republic System)

The major concern of the present article is the investigation of the dimensions and the trend of the effect of political theological disputes as one of the main factors on the political campaigns during the development of Islamic Republic of Iran system. Accordingly, it has been taken advantage of Skinner method in order to investigate the objective and subjective grounds as well as the classification of David Sanders on the static and fluctuating facets to study the effect of disputes over the political campaigns so that the conditions of developing the theological political disputes and the political campaigns during the development of Islamic Republic is investigated. The most significant theological political disputes of this era are the political dimensions of unity, universalism or comprehensiveness, legitimacy, Islam and national sovereignty. The change of regime and government, peaceful and violent challenges are considered as the four facets of impressionableness from the theological disputes. In this regard, the codes of conduct are considered as the direct effect of majority, the political approaches and status as the direct effect of minority, the development of new political parties as the indirect effect of majority and political events as the indirect effect of minority. The present article illustrates that this era is the observant of the increase in the political campaign as well as the increase of chaos in it due to the increase of theological political disputes