The ratio of gender subjectivity and political authority after the Islamic Revolution of Iran

Present paper is investigates relationship between gender subjectivity and political authority in the after Islamic revolution. The focus of this research is emphasizing on women's subjectivity and also political constancy in the present pattern for desirable society. By the use of Julia Kristeva's theory in pathology from different types of feminism,many attempts have been made to investigate social and political events after the Islamic Revolution, focusing on the ratio of authority and gender subjectivity in the four periods of the early years of the revolution and the period of war, construction, reform, and also after the 2009 elections. Therefore, the main question of the present study is How has gender subjectivity been determined and revised in relation to authority after the revolution?" In response to the question, this hypothesis is presented "gender subjectivity after the revolution has always been in a state of Contrary to political authority, it also has challenged with meaningful threats such as disregard for the sexual (gender)norms of governance in everyday life. " in this analysis, because of the lack of unity between authority , the subjectivity of women and unable general sphere ( is linked)and the possibilities of the policy's equilibrium in providing a space of defiance and interaction are presented.