Comparative analysis of Islamic revolution of Iran with February 14 Bahrain movement based on Goldstone's fourth generation theory

The "fourth generation" theory of Goldeston`s theories has been evaluated by some scholars in the field of ​​the Islamic Revolution study as one of the overarching theories on the causes of the revolutionary events. In this study, it has been attempted to assess the similarities and differences between the two events through the comparative analysis of Iran's revolution with the February 14 Bahrain Movement by the fourth-generation theory of Jack Goldstone, which illustrated the notion of significant similarities between the movement Bahrain and the Iranian Revolution. This has been due to the influence of its popular movements from the Islamic Revolution of Iran, and not on the interference of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Bahrain. The research question specifically describes the differences and similarities between the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the February 14 Bahraini Movement? The findings of this study, which are based on the comparative comparison method and the collection of resources based on the library method and the elite interview, suggest that the popular movements of Bahrain, in particular the February 14th movement, due to the influence of contemporary revolutions in the West Asia region, especially the Islamic Revolution of Iran, They have enjoyed the nature of the people and the spirit of arrogance and the same tyranny that they ruled to achieve victory in the same paths that led to similarities between them. The Bahraini system seeks to negate the impact of the Bahraini movements on Iran's revolution in rejecting the similarities of the February 14th Islamic Revolutionary Movement and its causes as Iran's interference in Bahrain, while the findings of this study prove the validity of the allegations made by the authors.