Base of agreement in options in Emamiye jurisprudence, Iran's law and The Sunni's jurisprudence

The necessity principle of contracts and its elimination impossibility which is called as ((requirement originality) ) is one of the dominating principles of all kinds of contracts that remains valid except the cases that are attributed by the legislator's sentence. options are one of the aforesaid principle attribution cases which leads to the contracts‟s insecurity. There is a disagreement among jurisconsults and jurists about the reasons of violating from ((requirement originality) ). Most of the Emamiye jurisconsults and some of the jurists believe in the aforesaid principle's base is just a violation from the express or implied terms between parties, the viewpoint that seems to affect the writers of the civil law. Nevertheless, the recent group usually haven‟t criticized the condition which violating from that leads to the option's convincement. The writer of this article will declare their point of view about the Base of agreement in options.