Analysis of Asif-Mohsen's performance practices in dealing with Nijashi and Tusi conflicts

Najashi and Sheikh Tusi are among the most famous Shi'ite religious scholars. Following the establishment of the Hilla school and the validation of the Hadith based on the document, the views of Rajali Najashi and Sheikh Tusi were of great importance. Najashi and Sheikh Toosi, according to the duty of science of Rijal, which is the determination of the reliability and weakness of the narrators, have referred to some of their admonitions in their books. But sometimes they are confused about the credibility and weakness of a narrator. In this regard, this paper, by analytical-descriptive method, attempts to investigate how Asif-Mohsseni exposed and interacts with contemporary religious scholars with these contradictions. Finally, it was concluded that the way of dealing with the conflicts of Najashi and Sheikh Tusi is not based on a rule or law, but depends on the inference and confidence that exists for the mujtahid and the religious scholars. Meanwhile, there is no strong reason to prefer Najashi's views on Sheikh Tusi, and how the interaction with the narrators varies according to the certainty that the researcher achieves.