humanization of international law in light of the concept of peace and self-sacrifice

Globalization and its multidimensional aspects, an increase in the number of governments and international organizations, development of the communications, the shrinking world and the tendency towards causing humans’ lives to be in danger as well as its environment to be endangered are considered the characteristics of the modern society. The International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, as a reflection of the realities existing in international community which shares common features with domestic law recently, in alignment with the tendency to convergence and sharing of common fate in the end, have obliged the governments in a steady way to undertake responsibilities and they are moving towards realization of the interests of all humans and governments rather than the governments themselves exclusively. Given that human rights have attracted attentions in the world in recent times, some governments turned a blind eye to human rights due to their conflict with the sovereignty, and consequently the government, as the entity supporting social rights, assumes it is necessary to create boundaries for human rights and restrain them, and human rights would prioritize humankind in its way to maintain human’s inherent dignity. An attempt to find or create a balanced point between implementation of human rights and maintenance of political-national elements has been the source of a lot of political tensions within the governments. The research aims to answer the following question: Is the international governance of human rights in conflict with the sovereignty of states or not? And in actuality, what challenges will “humanization of international law” face in light of the concept of sovereignty of states? Can a return to human’s inherent tendencies such as peace and self-sacrifice make a revolution in the sovereignty of states.