Correction of judicial processes in the light of the strategy of Elimination of conflict of interest

Conflict of interests refers to a situation where a person is in a position that can choose between personal and public interests. Discrediting the benefits of direct influence is not without the judge's mental independence, lack of transparency, undermining the legitimacy of the judicial system. Therefore, the issue of conflict of interests is to one The main strategies of policy making and change have become.This article, after introducing the conflict of interests in the judicial system, evaluates the legal system of Iran in terms of global standards in this field. The findings of the article show that despite the fact that the legislator in Iran He recognized the importance of the issue of conflict of interests and tried to some extent prevent it In some cases, the rules of conflict of interest rules have not been taken into account and the judiciary has been subject to conflict of interests. Some legal systems in this area have more coherent rules and procedures that can be modeled and modified by the rules for the elimination of conflicts of interest Such as the disappearance of golden signatures,asset declarations are among the solutions that can be used to prevent and manage conflicts of interest.