The Osuli-Jurisprudential Feasibility of Hadith Authenticity Sectioning

The Osuli-Jurisprudential Feasibility of Hadith Authenticity Sectioning [1]   Mustafa Far' Shirazi [2] Muhammad Taqi Fakhlaee [3] Mansooreh Bokayee [4]   Abstract Sectioning the instances of a tradition regarding its authority is one of the issues which has not been focused on in the subject of solitary hadith in Osuli books. Moreover, this issue has not devoted any discussion to itself in these books explicitly or implicitly. In another sense, there are traditions whose some parts are not authorized due to different reasons while their other parts are trustworthy and valid. Remarkably, this paper is to answer the two questions as follows: How are differences between the parts of a tradition in bearing authority or lacking authority reflected in Osuli and jurisprudential issues? Do scholars accept the separation and sectioning in the authority of the signified related to a tradition?   To answer these questions, the researchers have investigated Osuli and jurisprudential sources using a library research method and concluded that in jurisprudent's opinions, the supporters of sectioning are stronger and more frequent than the others, while Osuli scholars' opinions depict that they have confirmed sectioning indirectly.