Seven years survey study of complaints of facial cosmetic surgery referred to Shiraz Forensic administration since 2006 to 2013

Medical malpractice and violations and following that litigation by patients and finally recycling by them, is faced doctors and medical community with the growing crisis. Medical malpractice, ie, abuse of the specific requirements of the medical profession has the responsibility of doctor In fact, Including diagnosis and treatment and disease management mistakes

This study is a retrospective cross-sectional study to determine Seven years old complaints about facial cosmetic surgery that referred to forensic medicine of Fars province that in 1385 to 92 years was conducted.

In terms of gender between men (34/5%) and women (65/5%) relatively large differences can be seen in the complaint. In our study in according to marital status a huge difference between married (36/4%) and single (54/6%) was seen in the complaint. Most physician were specialist with 57.4% (n = 31), and then Subspecialty with 27.8% (n = 15) and general practitioners were (13%) of cases. According to the results, 60% (n = 33) of physician were acquitted and 40% were sentences (n=22). The results of most frequent type of expertise (n=28) is related to ENT specialists (50.9%), followed by plastic surgery with 29.1% (n = 16) and GP (12.7%).The area of operation, the rhinoplasty is the most frequent complaint among the plaintiffs in 32 cases (58.2%). The type of malpractice, most malpractice was using inappropriate techniques with 27/3% of cases. In this regard, lack of skill, complications of treatment and compound, any 22/7% allocated to own.