Redefining the permission rule and the resulting effects

One of the most important rules of jurisprudence, including eliminator for responsibility, is the permission rule, according to which, if a person, by the owner or the shareholder, is obliged to seize the property or right and incidentally causes it to be damaged, his act is not responsible. Regarding the nature, scope of this jurisprudential rule, it is clear from the detailed sources of legal and jurisprudential sources that there are many differences of opinion between jurists, and therefore no identical definition has been made about it. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive definition to permission by examining the above-mentioned theories and criticizing them, and then examining the points and effects of the new definition. It should be noted that the research method of this Article is the use of library tools.