Obtain Property by unlawful in the light of money laundering regulations

Obtain Property by unlawful, which was criminalized in accordance with Article 2 of the Aggravation Act of Perpetrators Punishment of Bribery, Embezzlement and Fraud in 1988, again, provide Note 3 of Article 2 in the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Amendment 2019. This Note, does not contravene the provisions of Aggravation Act, each of which is applicable in a particular situation. Obtain Property by unlawful in Aggravation Act, according to the ultimate interpretation, only be performed by persons with state privileges. Note 3 of Article 2 on the Money Laundering Act also apply where there is a "suspicion close to certainty" for unlawful Obtaining and the legitimacy of Obtaining is not established. In this case, the strong suspicion is reinforced that property is most likely the result of criminal behavior, but the type of criminal behavior is not specific for the judge. If it is proven, property is the result of a specific crime; the acquisition of such property is considered money laundering and is not subject to the abovementioned provision. Charges of unlawful obtaining will not be admissible, if it is established that property were not the result of the crime and were a result of a civil violation. The provisions of Note 3 include property that whose unlawful source is in serious doubt, with evidence of the sudden and unusual increase in assets. So, the basis of "suspicion close to certainty" it is assumed that the money was obtained through the commission of the crime