Controversy over meaning in the discourse of revolutionary poetry

The revolutionary poetry is a product of the strife amongst various discourses which had suffused the Iranian society’s literary arena from the late 40s till late 50s. In the present research, the topic of the struggle in between secular literary discourse and Islamic literary discourse, has been delved into. In order to conduct this study, discourse analysis Theory (from the standpoint of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe) has been applied. While Foucault discourse opinions have also been used. The strife between the two mentioned discourses has mainly been over their meaning and their attempts to reform ate the concepts of revolutionary poetry. Historicity and phenomenology of literary have not been dropped out either. the process of conceptual formation named revolutionary poetry has been analyzed through there conflict. According to this study, the poetry of the Islamic Revolution resulted of some epistemological breakdown (in Foucault words) of the previously stabilized process with its find exclusion. As a result of this struggle, the revolutionary poetry adopted a new formulation with the hegemonic intervention of the new political institution, having emerged from the revolution. This different current brought about a type of political poetry, called the Islamic Revolution's poesy.