Examining the vague confession of the status of civil rights

Since confession in civil matters is at the forefront of other arguments and is considered a decisive condition of the lawsuit, the legislator did not consider denial after confession in these cases to be heard, but immediately after not hearing denial after confession, due to The probability of proving contrary to what has been stated by the confession or the non-fulfillment of the established conditions under which he has confessed, according to which he has confessed, has predicted the cases in which the confession will be affected, such as proving the corruption of confession or its basis. On mistakes and things like that. Of course, the confession will remain valid until the allegations are substantiated. This article is devoted to examining the views of jurists and jurists on the possibility of hearing denial after confession in civil matters, which will play a decisive role in the probative power of the reason.