The strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in response to the deprivation of the right to life in the assassination of Martyr Fakhrizadeh (Nuclear scientist)

The solution for human society is to conclude dozens of conventions centered on terrorism in order to counter state terrorism; but the United States and Israel have targeted the security of rival governments by committing international and illegal crimes through terrorism. The assassination of nuclear scientists, especially Dr. Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, has been defined as US and Israeli state terrorism and is contrary to Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The unwillingness of international organizations and courts to fight terrorism has led to the immunity of hostile states. In this article, the author examines the right to life and the prohibition of its deprivation in Islam and international rules to answer the question that what strategy should the Islamic Republic of Iran adopt to condemn the main perpetrators of the assassination of Martyr Fakhrizadeh? The basic hypothesis of this article in answer to the main question is that litigation in international courts, reciprocal action, information dominance and countering intrusion into security and intelligence devices, Prevention of money laundering offenses, imposition of financial penalties and sanctions on countries that support terrorism and challenging terrorist movements with the mass media are the most appropriate solutions.