Objection to the validity of the judicial decision By comparative study of the legal system of Iran and Lebanon and international lawsuits

Objection to the final judicial order means that the judicial process that led to the final verdict should be conducted only once and not reopened. This is accepted by the laws of countries and in international lawsuits. Therefore, in order to prevent rulings that conflict with public order and achieve legal stability, as well as peace and tranquility both domestically and internationally, it must be respected as a general rule.

In this article, the descriptive-analytical method in the form of a library using books and articles in this field has been used.

The present article comparatively examines the objections of the judiciary in the law of Iran, Lebanon and international lawsuits and came to the conclusion that the law of the two countries and even international documents recognize this objection. Despite the existence of three main elements of cause, subject and unity of litigants, as the main elements of challenging the judicial termination, in some cases there are differences that we examine.