A Comparative Study of Fakhr Razi's and Mulla Sadra's Views on Scholars Interpreting Similarities with Emphasis on the Qur'anic Term of Al-Rasikhun al-Alam

Interpretability or the existence of sacred texts and scriptures has been one of the issues raised by Muslim and non-Muslim thinkers. "Interpretation" has been used in the topic of interpretationOne of the most important issues in the Qur'anic sciences is the problem of understanding the analogies and the scholars of interpretation in terms of who is qualified to interpret the analogies, including disputes between scholars, especially Shiite and Sunni commentators. Compare the data and opinions of Fakhr Razi and Mulla SadraAccording to the above verse, some scholars consider the science of interpretation to be analogous to God alone, and others do not consider it exclusive to God. Mulla Sadra excludes interpretation from being confined to the domain of language, believing that every phenomenon has interpretation and interpretation. Believes in a certain way and considers the perfect example of Rasikhan in science in addition to the infallible non-infallible scholars.Fakhr Razi, on the other hand, believes that the only Almighty God is aware of the interpretation of the parallels. From their point of view, lack of knowledge of the interpretation of the parallels does not mean denying the existence of God; We also have faithAlthough science is not similar to verses.