Criticism of Revision Rules and Objection to Vote of Disciplinary in the Securities Market

Objection and revision of the opinions of the disciplinary authorities of the securities market law are subject to criticism according to the current regulations. The primary law enforcement authority in the said law, the board of directors and the verdict shall be revised by the board of directors of the organization. Some cases, including the assignment of the first review of the violation of the CEO and members of the board of directors of the other organs of the self-governing body to the "board of directors of the organization" in accordance with the rules and removal of the review of these votes and the initial consideration of the committee and the panel in cases where the accused members of the offense Self-governing organizations are not in violation of the Market Act, However, allocation should, if necessary, be in accordance with the law, not the regulations. The Verdict of unity of procedure of the Administrative Justice Court has denied the possibility of complaining of definitive disciplinary votes in the Administrative Justice Court; This is in accordance with the principle of the jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court as a general reference to complaints from the opinions of the administrative authorities and the Act of the Administrative Justice Court and the nature of the disciplinary proceedings of these references contrary to the need for judicial review of the Court.