The bests interests of juvenile

Achievements of different knowledge such as criminology and penology and also use of answering experiences to criminals show that equivalent giving response and answering to crimes perpetrators, were inefficient and that lead to stabilizing crimes of juvenile offender. In the meantime, documents and international regulations of human rights also with emphasis on different components are still in search for blockage of cycle of becoming a habit of delinquent of this category of citizens. The bests interests of juvenile offender, that as a strategic and fundamental principle was important for system of criminal policy of united nations, and considered as an index so that internal criminal policymakers of countries by that can make decision about choosing methods for removal and stop of relationship of children and teens with criminal process for ever and can be provided as a goal. Criminal justice system of Iran also by these changes in 1392 and by following from paragraph 1 of article 3 of convention on the rights of the children tried to respect to this principle and, in the light of readings of it, in two levels of giving answer and answering as that is possible select a cohesive policy and that to what extent it was successful, is a subject that this writing will consider it. Because it seems that on one hand legislator seek to respect to the bests interests of juvenile in punishable crimes and on the other hand, try to respect to laws, limits and retaliation, that in this way faced with significant duality.