Critique and Survey of the Most Common Used Words in Fabricated Traditions

The incorrect entry of narratives into the domain of fake narrations is one of the pests that harms one of the most important religious sources of Muslims and damages its credibility. One of the issues that cause the frequency of fake narrations be considered unrealistic, vast and far-reaching is the lack of awareness and knowledge of the words used in fake narrations, and the degree of its adaptation and closeness to the subject of “forge”. The lexical and semantic study of the definitions provided by the Shiite and Sunni scholars such as Shahid Thani, Mirdamad, Abu Rayyea, etc. indicate the weakness of the hadith and not forgery. Numerous examples of narrations can be found in fake narration books as well as fake books, which only indicate the weakness of the hadith, but the author of the book has specified the falsification of the hadith and has increased the number of fake narrations intentionally or unknowingly. According to the breadth of this issue in some fake narration books, in this article, it will be only examined the most common incorrect uses of words for this category of narrations. For this purpose, the most important words in the field of hadith weakness have been examined in various narration books and examples of research claims have been presented. This article is provided in a descriptive-analytical method. At the end, it is presented that the correct use of words, limits  the range of fake narrations and removes many narrations from the this area.