the Criticism on the unanimous vote of the Supreme Court's Supreme Court No. 764 regarding the prohibition of the use of the sentenced person to a permanent imprisonment on probation

The issue of the permission or the denial of the use of life-sentenced prisoners of imprisonment from probation is one of the issues that has been the subject of dispute between courts for several years, and some, according to the Note to Article 1337, allow probationers to be imprisoned for life, and some, based on the advent of 38 The Islamic Penal Code of 1370, Article 58 of the Criminal Code Approved by the same text as the substitute article 38 of the aforementioned law, it has been considered abandoned by the Note for the Unilateral Article of 1337, and the conditional release of the convicted prisoners for life imprisonment was considered unlawful. In this paper, while expressing legal views on this issue and evaluating and analyzing those views, the Verdict of Unity of the Supreme Court's Supreme Court No. 764 regarding the prohibition of the use of convicts for permanent custody of conditional release is criticized and concluded. It has led to the fact that the unanimity of the Supreme Court's Supreme Court No. 764 is lacking in argumentable arguments and contrary to legal practice.