The debate in texts in 4th and 5th century (Theology encyclopedia), Nowruznameh, Kimiaye Saadat

Analysis of the debate has main contents and theories which each may be effective for analysis of encyclopedia, Nowruznameh, Kimiaye Saadat. The debate studies are important for showing a methodical relation between social, political and religious views of critics. Among this, the Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Muffle debates which are closer to the Foucault one globally and also Fairleigh debate may be used. Study of Avicenna, Khayam and Ghazali debates provides possibility of challenging inclusive debate ruling on effect and evolution of stabilized system of its concepts by determining meaningful relation of the text.

The present research is a descriptive-analytical study which has been performed by library method. In this research, the formation of the debate which is used by these three writers are analyzed by approach of debate analysis.

This study shows that the Avicenna debate in proving Asity is a philosophical-rational debate relying on reasoning. Khayam debate is a cultural-material debate which plays a fundamental role in reproduction of Nowruznameh debate. Ghazali debate has a mystical trend.

Although these three debates are in contrast with each other, but the Khayam broad-minded debate is in contrast with the Avicenna and Ghazali broad-minded debates and the Avicenna and Ghazali debates are in contrast with each other. Among these three debates, the dominant Ghazali debate, with overstatement and boycott mechanism, rejects two other debates and features its debate as dominant and best power.