study the physician's Responsibility in dealing Patient with COVID-19

The global outbreak of the coronavirus as an epidemic has posed one of the most critical conditions for the global system, and in practice countries are facing new political, social and economic challenges, but on the other hand, this issue has become an opportunity to redefine It is a scientific phenomenon. In the field of criminal law, this experience can be effective in various fields of legal criminal sciences such as criminal law and experimental criminal sciences such as criminology. One of the important issues in this field is the responsibility of the doctor in this serious situation.

This article descriptively and analytically examines the issue in specific conditions of Patients with Koronavirus disease while paying attention to the basic rules and principles related to physician responsibility.Findings and

The findings of this study indicate that, firstly, in certain coronary conditions, the burden of proving guilt is removed from the physician. Secondly, the physician uses the information and knowledge of his time in the treatment of patients, but of course the dimensions of the subject of treatment of coronary patients are still unknown due to special medical practice, so the concept of guilt changes in these cases. Third, in some cases, such as vaccination, the guarantee should be the responsibility of the government and not the medical staff. Keywords: Infectious Disease, COVID-19, Physician Responsibility, omission, Guarantee