Study of implicit (implied) claim in Iranian and French civil procedure

Some requests and claims have the capacity to contain another claim. The proceeding of a claim involves the processing of another claim that is inside, such as a requirement to draw instrument under seal that ensures validity of transfer and the court properly confirmed. Is it possible for the court to hear the implicit claim? Jurisdiction, court costs and appeals against the court ruling based on which request should be made? It seems in such claims the court can hear the customary, rational, and legal requirements that is the inseparable part of claim. In fact, these issues have also been implicitly demanded by the plaintiff. In such claims, the jurisdiction and appeal of the judgment and the cost of the proceeding shall be determined on the basis of the ultimate claim. In France and in Arab countries such as Egypt such claims are not disputed but there is often resistance to acceptance in Iranian judicial practice. Since the acceptance of such lawsuits can undoubtedly facilitate litigation and reduce the social and economic costs of litigation in the Iranian judicial, we are going to examine the different aspects of implicit litigation in this descriptive-analytical article. By reducing the ambiguities, the way will be provided for the acceptance of implicit lawsuits in the judicial procedure.